Scuderia Ferrari SF90

[zibby43]

Any pictures of the car from Bahrain?

Not yet.

More Ferrari performance speculation. This time from Helmut Marko:

https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/cool ... o/4359176/

[F1Krof]

Any pictures of the car from Bahrain?

Not yet.

More Ferrari performance speculation. This time from Helmut Marko:

https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/cool ... o/4359176/

By this standard, it would mean Bahrain to be even tougher on Ferrari, since it's way hotter.

[zibby43]

Any pictures of the car from Bahrain?

Not yet.

More Ferrari performance speculation. This time from Helmut Marko:

https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/cool ... o/4359176/

By this standard, it would mean Bahrain to be even tougher on Ferrari, since it's way hotter.

It's going to be pretty toasty on race day. High of 88 F on race day (low of 74). Ambient temperature will be somewhere in between with it being a night race.

My question is, if PU cooling really is the issue, what do Ferrari do? Is this related to what they've done with significantly paring back the intake opening and engine cover?

If they re-arrange the cooling architecture, what does that do to the CoG and RW efficiency targets that they tried to set with the car?

[Capharol]

if it's really a cooling problem, i don't see them fix that within 2 weeks

[F1Krof]

Not yet.

More Ferrari performance speculation. This time from Helmut Marko:

https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/cool ... o/4359176/

By this standard, it would mean Bahrain to be even tougher on Ferrari, since it's way hotter.

It's going to be pretty toasty on race day. High of 88 F on race day (low of 74). Ambient temperature will be somewhere in between with it being a night race.

My question is, if PU cooling really is the issue, what do Ferrari do? Is this related to what they've done with significantly paring back the intake opening and engine cover?

If they re-arrange the cooling architecture, what does that do to the CoG and RW efficiency targets that they tried to set with the car?

If you're asking me, honestly I don't believe it. Marko's guesses are highly unreliable as far as history's concern. Ferrari's problem in Australia were mostly about the tires. And my guess is that Sakhir would really fit Ferrari, historically they've always been strong.

So I'm expected Ferrari on top this weekend.

[Capharol]

By this standard, it would mean Bahrain to be even tougher on Ferrari, since it's way hotter.

It's going to be pretty toasty on race day. High of 88 F on race day (low of 74). Ambient temperature will be somewhere in between with it being a night race.

My question is, if PU cooling really is the issue, what do Ferrari do? Is this related to what they've done with significantly paring back the intake opening and engine cover?

If they re-arrange the cooling architecture, what does that do to the CoG and RW efficiency targets that they tried to set with the car?

If you're asking me, honestly I don't believe it. Marko's guesses are highly unreliable as far as history's concern. Ferrari's problem in Australia were mostly about the tires. And my guess is that Sakhir would really fit Ferrari, historically they've always been strong.

So I'm expected Ferrari on top this weekend.

and why should Marko lie about a problem that occured at Ferrari?

He has no benefit of telling this to the media for RB
and bare in mind aswell, if a reporter asks you "why had Ferrari problems in Australia" should he say i don't know although he has seen all the indication of a possible cooling problem?

or do you know more of whats going on at Ferrari? (just a curious-question)

[F1Krof]

It's going to be pretty toasty on race day. High of 88 F on race day (low of 74). Ambient temperature will be somewhere in between with it being a night race.

My question is, if PU cooling really is the issue, what do Ferrari do? Is this related to what they've done with significantly paring back the intake opening and engine cover?

If they re-arrange the cooling architecture, what does that do to the CoG and RW efficiency targets that they tried to set with the car?

If you're asking me, honestly I don't believe it. Marko's guesses are highly unreliable as far as history's concern. Ferrari's problem in Australia were mostly about the tires. And my guess is that Sakhir would really fit Ferrari, historically they've always been strong.

So I'm expected Ferrari on top this weekend.

and why should Marko lie about a problem that occured at Ferrari?

He has no benefit of telling this to the media for RB
and bare in mind aswell, if a reporter asks you "why had Ferrari problems in Australia" should he say i don't know although he has seen all the indication of a possible cooling problem?

or do you know more of whats going on at Ferrari? (just a curious-question)

I do not for sure. But the fact that Marko says so doesn't mean it true. If we listen to Marko, then why not listen to Toto, who said that it was a setup issue?

[Capharol]

If you're asking me, honestly I don't believe it. Marko's guesses are highly unreliable as far as history's concern. Ferrari's problem in Australia were mostly about the tires. And my guess is that Sakhir would really fit Ferrari, historically they've always been strong.

So I'm expected Ferrari on top this weekend.

and why should Marko lie about a problem that occured at Ferrari?

He has no benefit of telling this to the media for RB
and bare in mind aswell, if a reporter asks you "why had Ferrari problems in Australia" should he say i don't know although he has seen all the indication of a possible cooling problem?

or do you know more of whats going on at Ferrari? (just a curious-question)

I do not for sure. But the fact that Marko says so doesn't mean it true. If we listen to Marko, then why not listen to Toto, who said that it was a setup issue?

maybe its a bit of both? or maybe Toto is lying..... it ain't all black and white.
and it isn't so that Marko always lies and the others tells the truth...... like most of you seems to think.

Marko is an expierenced driver, knows the game from the in and outside, yes i agree sometimes he talks to much.
But as soon as someone here writes "Marko said...." there is always 1 or 2 that immediatly starts to scream "Marko lies..." but if Toto says so "oh yes it must be true, because Toto says so" ...

my point is it's getting boring, beating on a person all the time (this counts for drivers and managers, hell even users here, all alike), why just not take it for granted and let his/her words stand as they are, think your own thoughts but just stop saying he/she lies without really knowing if he/she is lying or not......maybe we see it later if it's true or not, or maybe we will never know it at all.

[BwajSF]

Any pictures of the car from Bahrain?

Not yet.

More Ferrari performance speculation. This time from Helmut Marko:

https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/cool ... o/4359176/

Hahahaha... Its the same guy who said Ferrari were 0.5 ahead of the field.
Move on guys. Just hot air here.

[KiLLu12258]

Any pictures of the car from Bahrain?

Not yet.

More Ferrari performance speculation. This time from Helmut Marko:

https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/cool ... o/4359176/

Hahahaha... Its the same guy who said Ferrari were 0.5 ahead of the field.
Move on guys. Just hot air here.

he also said redbull is ahead of mercedes.

[CriXus]

[MtthsMlw]

[NathanOlder]

Will it not be cooler as its a night race ?

[GoranF1]

How much weight does mat paint saves on whole car?

[jumpingfish]

How much weight does mat paint saves on whole car?

Binotto said few hundred grammes