A few tenths behind Mercedes though.
The energy calculus on these cars seems so marginal with no mgu-h and no front end regen I don't think they can afford to lose any more recharging.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑13 Feb 2026, 12:59They can ban recharching without brakes. It would mean you don't harvest at end of straights until you hit the brakes. They couldn't recharge 8.5 MJ per lap and would be slower overall but if everyone hates this they could do it.
Oh cool then, that is how much Lewis is slower anyways...
At the moment Ferrari looks a lot like McLaren looked last year. They set effortless quick laptimes on low fuel and they have one really impressive race sim in Charles Leclerc yesterday (but Lewis' run today was not too shabby either).SoulPancake13 wrote: ↑13 Feb 2026, 17:42For those who care, Mercedes said George's morning stint was 26 seconds slower than Leclerc's race sim yesterday in the afternoon.
IMO Kimi's race run this afternoon was very strong, I believe better than both Leclerc and Hamilton's yesterday? We will see of course, I am happy that the base of the car seems good and we seem overall reliable. Some more upgrades next week and before Melbourne and maybe they just might be the leading car.Emag wrote: ↑13 Feb 2026, 17:57At the moment Ferrari looks a lot like McLaren looked last year. They set effortless quick laptimes on low fuel and they have one really impressive race sim in Charles Leclerc yesterday (but Lewis' run today was not too shabby either).SoulPancake13 wrote: ↑13 Feb 2026, 17:42For those who care, Mercedes said George's morning stint was 26 seconds slower than Leclerc's race sim yesterday in the afternoon.
If it weren't for all these engine shenanigans, I don't see why you wouldn't put Ferrari as the leading team at the moment.
They just ran out of fuel, Fred confirmed itToffeeTyres wrote: ↑13 Feb 2026, 18:06Hoping the stoppage was just a sensor issue and nothing else. Didn’t sound Mechanical. If it’s true they used same engine for the shakedown and here. That is impressive. Car looks smooth and balanced I just hope the battery deployment and regen is good but I’m sure as the season goes on clever people will implement some good software for it as will most teams. So far it’s looking good no major issues
The stint on the mediums in the middle seems particularly strong (if quite short) - I haven’t noticed consistent 37s from any other sims I’ve seen.Luscion wrote: ↑13 Feb 2026, 17:56Hams long runs
Softs
1:39.670
1:40.098
1:39.645
1:39.186
1:39.324
1:39.618
1:39.472
1:39.918
1:40.372
1:40.786
1:39.999
1:40.092
1:41.089
1:40.833
1:41.272
1:41.517
Mediums
1:37.358
1:37.346
1:37.483
1:38.142
1:37.281
1:37.154
1:38:0
1:37:544
Timing Died
Hards
1:38.955
1:38.568
1:38.797
1:38.776
1:38.468
1:39.152
1:39.010
1:38.591
1:38.967
1:39.119
1:38.926
1:38.906
1:38.879
1:39.060
1:38.972
1:39.543
1:39.103
Good to know. Probably doing a fuel test run it as close to dry as possible to get info. Main thing is the engine is good and has been bullet proof so far especially if it is as rumoured to have been same engine in both here and shakedown. Obviously I don’t think they’ve nor other teams fully opened the taps on the cars yet but it’s looking good for us so far being reliableLuscion wrote: ↑13 Feb 2026, 18:07They just ran out of fuel, Fred confirmed itToffeeTyres wrote: ↑13 Feb 2026, 18:06Hoping the stoppage was just a sensor issue and nothing else. Didn’t sound Mechanical. If it’s true they used same engine for the shakedown and here. That is impressive. Car looks smooth and balanced I just hope the battery deployment and regen is good but I’m sure as the season goes on clever people will implement some good software for it as will most teams. So far it’s looking good no major issues
The user put this in a weird order (no offense). Lewis went S - H - M. Hard stint was consistent which is good - Kimi's was pretty decently faster. Medium stint we had live timing go out, but Lewis ended it roughly in the mid/high 1.38s.f1316 wrote: ↑13 Feb 2026, 18:07The stint on the mediums in the middle seems particularly strong (if quite short) - I haven’t noticed consistent 37s from any other sims I’ve seen.Luscion wrote: ↑13 Feb 2026, 17:56Hams long runs
Softs
1:39.670
1:40.098
1:39.645
1:39.186
1:39.324
1:39.618
1:39.472
1:39.918
1:40.372
1:40.786
1:39.999
1:40.092
1:41.089
1:40.833
1:41.272
1:41.517
Mediums
1:37.358
1:37.346
1:37.483
1:38.142
1:37.281
1:37.154
1:38:0
1:37:544
Timing Died
Hards
1:38.955
1:38.568
1:38.797
1:38.776
1:38.468
1:39.152
1:39.010
1:38.591
1:38.967
1:39.119
1:38.926
1:38.906
1:38.879
1:39.060
1:38.972
1:39.543
1:39.103
P.S. apparently Charles’ was 28 secs faster than George’s - but who’s counting! Tbh I do think time of day is a major factor anyway