I hope they do not make too radical a change after so many (small but) forwards steps this year.Ground Effect wrote: ↑25 Sep 2019, 11:02James Key must be relishing the different challenge he has in McLaren. Interesting article, I just hope we don't get another 2013.
https://www.planetf1.com/news/mclaren-p ... hallenger/
If their conceptual changes are dues to what they have learned from this years car then where’s the drama?Big Tea wrote: ↑25 Sep 2019, 11:10I hope they do not make too radical a change after so many (small but) forwards steps this year.Ground Effect wrote: ↑25 Sep 2019, 11:02James Key must be relishing the different challenge he has in McLaren. Interesting article, I just hope we don't get another 2013.
https://www.planetf1.com/news/mclaren-p ... hallenger/
He says ~“So, I think fundamentally we won’t change the numbers surrounding it, but conceptually it will change a little bit.”~
But it was only small steps that brought Mclaren to where they are ans a very small backward step could easily see them slide 3 or 4 places back.
I know they have to run to stand still and would be swamped without changes, but it is still a concern
Actually, I'd say most mid-fielders including Mclaren have a worse race pace than quali. Plenty of factors behind this obviously but the most significant one is probably the tyre management.the EDGE wrote: ↑25 Sep 2019, 18:43If their conceptual changes are dues to what they have learned from this years car then where’s the drama?Big Tea wrote: ↑25 Sep 2019, 11:10I hope they do not make too radical a change after so many (small but) forwards steps this year.Ground Effect wrote: ↑25 Sep 2019, 11:02James Key must be relishing the different challenge he has in McLaren. Interesting article, I just hope we don't get another 2013.
https://www.planetf1.com/news/mclaren-p ... hallenger/
He says ~“So, I think fundamentally we won’t change the numbers surrounding it, but conceptually it will change a little bit.”~
But it was only small steps that brought Mclaren to where they are ans a very small backward step could easily see them slide 3 or 4 places back.
I know they have to run to stand still and would be swamped without changes, but it is still a concern
Let’s not forget they’re still 1sec a lap down on pace in race trim alone, even more on Saturdays, so something still needs to change
I’ve never herd anyone suggest, nor seen any evidence that McLaren have tyre issues. They even voted to keep the current range when others wanted a change. Now Hass is a team with tyre struggles, that’s plain and simple to see.M840TR wrote: ↑25 Sep 2019, 18:46Actually, I'd say most mid-fielders including Mclaren have a worse race pace than quali. Plenty of factors behind this obviously but the most significant one is probably the tyre management.the EDGE wrote: ↑25 Sep 2019, 18:43If their conceptual changes are dues to what they have learned from this years car then where’s the drama?Big Tea wrote: ↑25 Sep 2019, 11:10
I hope they do not make too radical a change after so many (small but) forwards steps this year.
He says ~“So, I think fundamentally we won’t change the numbers surrounding it, but conceptually it will change a little bit.”~
But it was only small steps that brought Mclaren to where they are ans a very small backward step could easily see them slide 3 or 4 places back.
I know they have to run to stand still and would be swamped without changes, but it is still a concern
Let’s not forget they’re still 1sec a lap down on pace in race trim alone, even more on Saturdays, so something still needs to change
I don't think he is suggesting they have tyre issues, just that with less downforce the tyre wear is naturally higher than a leading team, hence a greater race drop off.the EDGE wrote: ↑25 Sep 2019, 21:22I’ve never herd anyone suggest, nor seen any evidence that McLaren have tyre issues. They even voted to keep the current range when others wanted a change. Now Hass is a team with tyre struggles, that’s plain and simple to see.
As far as I am aware McLaren simply lack efficient downforce, they have some... more than others, but still along way from top 3 (relatively speaking of course)
I just have a feeling that they will be looking at the front and mid wing for next year. I wonder what Key knows about this years RB solution and how it can aid Mclaren.Big Tea wrote: ↑25 Sep 2019, 11:10I hope they do not make too radical a change after so many (small but) forwards steps this year.Ground Effect wrote: ↑25 Sep 2019, 11:02James Key must be relishing the different challenge he has in McLaren. Interesting article, I just hope we don't get another 2013.
https://www.planetf1.com/news/mclaren-p ... hallenger/
He says ~“So, I think fundamentally we won’t change the numbers surrounding it, but conceptually it will change a little bit.”~
But it was only small steps that brought Mclaren to where they are ans a very small backward step could easily see them slide 3 or 4 places back.
I know they have to run to stand still and would be swamped without changes, but it is still a concern
Got to love lando
Probably a tighter packaging with revised intercoolers and maybe a raised rear suspension/transmission setup for creating space for low-pressure area over diffuser. I don't expect significantly radical changes to the front wing however; if they can devise a clever & effective front suspension without excessively biasing the front wing for downforce then the tapered arrangement won't do much harm.mwillems wrote: ↑25 Sep 2019, 23:10I just have a feeling that they will be looking at the front and mid wing for next year. I wonder what Key knows about this years RB solution and how it can aid Mclaren.Big Tea wrote: ↑25 Sep 2019, 11:10I hope they do not make too radical a change after so many (small but) forwards steps this year.Ground Effect wrote: ↑25 Sep 2019, 11:02James Key must be relishing the different challenge he has in McLaren. Interesting article, I just hope we don't get another 2013.
https://www.planetf1.com/news/mclaren-p ... hallenger/
He says ~“So, I think fundamentally we won’t change the numbers surrounding it, but conceptually it will change a little bit.”~
But it was only small steps that brought Mclaren to where they are ans a very small backward step could easily see them slide 3 or 4 places back.
I know they have to run to stand still and would be swamped without changes, but it is still a concern
Yeah, you go backwards by standing still. So you need to move forward and have faith.RonDennis wrote: ↑26 Sep 2019, 12:23I think they viewed this year also as learning proces and probably made some changes that were maybe a bit too extreme after their terrible 2018. The chassis department clearly did a good job for this year, so have some faith. I also still believe that the 2017 McLaren was a very good car.
I wouldn't be so pessimistic. Mclaren has been like this, during free practices, for many gps. I would wait for the qualifying before I make any conclusions.SmallSoldier wrote: ↑27 Sep 2019, 15:13It seems that Mclaren doesn’t have the expected pace in Sochi... It’s only practice and I’m sure there is more to be found before Qualifying, but they may be missing a golden opportunity for points in Russia since both RBR’s will probably start in 10-11th position.
Was expecting more today.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk