Hence why I choose to use "related". Of course it's guessing from both of us, but I think that Sauber just came up with idea themselves. Red Bull of course obviously copied Sauber in that regard.raymondu999 wrote:Inspired, not pioneered...
Hence why I choose to use "related". Of course it's guessing from both of us, but I think that Sauber just came up with idea themselves. Red Bull of course obviously copied Sauber in that regard.raymondu999 wrote:Inspired, not pioneered...
The original "ramp" was nothing like its current incarnation. It was more like a bridge during testing, which they never got to work. At Valencia they then introduced a sauber-like ramp. He sticked to the concept, but used a totally different piece of bodywork in the end.Sevach wrote:I believe Newey said he always thought of using that solution once his original one was deemed illegal, RedBull never planned to race the "aero neutral" solution.
If you listen to Goss words Mclaren apparently also considered this solution even before the MP4-27 launch.
Just because Sauber was the first to display it doesn't mean everybody copied.
If you think about it, Sauber was on and off with their ramp (apparently now off for good), RedBull is the team that stuck with it all along, the fiddled with it a lot, but ultimately always swore by the solution.
If you're saying what I think you're saying, you have it the other way around.turbof1 wrote:The original "ramp" was nothing like its current incarnation. It was more like a bridge during testing, which they never got to work. At Valencia they then introduced a sauber-like ramp. He sticked to the concept, but used a totally different piece of bodywork in the end.
It was developed, the Mclaren solution has also seem a number of interpretation and changes, among it's huge number of users.turbof1 wrote: The original "ramp" was nothing like its current incarnation.
was more like a bridge during testing, which they never got to work.
The Valencia spec biggest improvement is widely believed to have little do with the ramp itself but with getting the tunnel underpass to work.At Valencia they then introduced a sauber-like ramp. He sticked to the concept, but used a totally different piece of bodywork in the end.
Tell that to all the teams that have freely switched back and forth in the past two years. Red Bull, Sauber, STR...Hobbs04 wrote:Due to engine mapping restrictions your really locked into one design direction. Red bull have optimized their maps to the tunnel under ramp. Ferrari are vice versa. I've read the red bull maps for the tunnel design saps a few more horsepower but the gains in df negate that.