That's not true. Just look at Vettel's last stint in China - with very little fuel and still they didn't risk more than 5 quick laps. And his times were already increasing.Phil wrote: The only issue I have is that the tyres are what they are. During re-fueling, the choice to how quick the car could lap the circuit was mainly in the teams and drivers hand. If they wanted quicker lap times, they would do shorter stints with less fuel - if they wanted a different strategy, they would do more fuel with longer stints. In that sense, it was easy to calculate what is mathematically the quickest way to complete the race, but not knowing what the other drivers do and where you would drop into traffic when you would pit, added a certain element of unpredictability as well.
I think you've missed Phil's point - I believe he is saying why he preferred the strategic elements and unpredictability that refuelling brought to F1 over the strategic elements and unpredictability that the Pirelli tyres bring. He is not advocating bringing refuelling back to help reduce the tyre wear.Dragonfly wrote:That's not true. Just look at Vettel's last stint in China - with very little fuel and still they didn't risk more than 5 quick laps. And his times were already increasing.Phil wrote: The only issue I have is that the tyres are what they are. During re-fueling, the choice to how quick the car could lap the circuit was mainly in the teams and drivers hand. If they wanted quicker lap times, they would do shorter stints with less fuel - if they wanted a different strategy, they would do more fuel with longer stints. In that sense, it was easy to calculate what is mathematically the quickest way to complete the race, but not knowing what the other drivers do and where you would drop into traffic when you would pit, added a certain element of unpredictability as well.
I've seen this refueling explanation several times in different places but I don't accept it. True, there is difference in starting with a full tank, but this difference is not so huge to be a decisive factor. Tyres simply do not hold, so even bringing back refueling will not change much.
The times with refueling was not that unpredictable.But I do not like the huge problems with these tires, either. When the pits tell you to not protect your position, it is no longer good racing.Websta wrote:I think you've missed Phil's point - I believe he is saying why he preferred the strategic elements and unpredictability that refuelling brought to F1 over the strategic elements and unpredictability that the Pirelli tyres bring. He is not advocating bringing refuelling back to help reduce the tyre wear.
I can understand this change taking into account how little the soft tyres lasted in the last race, but what they are going to do after Barcelona is a complete shame.godlameroso wrote:Well it wouldn't make much sense to bring the soft and super soft here as they wouldn't last more than two laps to 6 laps
raymondu999 wrote:StrikeForceF1 wrote:Sorry have to disagree with you there
Lol no reason to be sorry mate - everyone has their own opinions and preferences.
with no pitstops and no overtaking I think racing will just become a snore fest as it was in the Schumi days
Thats correct.....I agree....F1 is more than a tv show it is more than the on-track action...thats why I love it...its also about the strategy...making the best of what you got and if you miles ahead of the competition than congratulations to you.If all you did was watch the race highlights - yes. The BBC put it the best when in their hour-long 2011 season review, they gave an entire 4 seconds to the Valencia GP. It's just that I think F1 is more than the television show, and more than the on-track action. I probably spend 60% of my time during a GP staring at timing screens and working out strategies and calculating ahead to the race finish, and so I really don't mind. (I proudly correctly predicted Button to finish P5, and Vettel to be P4 and harassing P3 by the end of the race)
....with aero being the dependent factor that they are and have been for a while the cars would end where they started, given the reliability these days...
agreedIf they managed to build a car reliable enough to win the race - and at a greater speed than the others - then you've done the best job, in my opinion. You should be rewarded.
so than my question to you is why even have an F1 race when all you need is a 1 lap qualifying shoot out like we used to have(boring in my opinion) and award the points accordingly and decide the world championship that way.
Aaah now we getting somewhere, what good is that race pace if as you say "0 pitstops and 0 overtaking" ,I think you said , If you don'y qualify on poll than it is useless....If I qualify with a car that is lets say 0.5 s slower in race trim, you can run for a hundred laps but without overtaking would mean that I would still finish in front of you the same way we started and as such the race was just a parade and would serve no use as without overtaking everyone would finish the race in the same position they qualified in thus better to just issue points for qualifying because you will already know the outcome of the race. As things stand at the moment it is because of the variations that you can calculate and work out where the guys are going to finish but still the outcome can be different from the postions where the drivers qualified in.Well it wouldn't be *as* grim, because race vs qualifying pace would probably still be different to each other.
It is absolutely pointless if you are going to have a race with no overtaking...
Tell that to the Olympics and the sprint races.
[/quote][/quote]F1 should, IMO - be a competition, not a show. Or should we start giving Usain Bolt success ballast?
I prefer FP2 data.raymondu999 wrote:I love to speculate too, but I think the best course of action is probably to look at FP1 data and go from there.
Do you think that would be possible?Darknight wrote:Once again we have rain here today. Hope it rains during the race
Nope, it's only possible if you gather all your friends and constantly peeing on track. I dont know how someone can expect rain, in middle of desert, when every drop of rain automatically dry on hot asphalt after few seconds on 40 celsius temperatureMika1 wrote:Do you think that would be possible?Darknight wrote:Once again we have rain here today. Hope it rains during the race