Williams FW48

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
Francesc
Francesc
51
Joined: 20 Jun 2009, 21:44

Re: Williams FW48

Post

Image

tomazy
tomazy
227
Joined: 10 Jan 2006, 13:01

Re: Williams FW48

Post

Surely the cable managment can be managed better?

Francesc
Francesc
51
Joined: 20 Jun 2009, 21:44

Re: Williams FW48

Post

Agreed, the sidepods have a lot of room to be shrinked with a bit more of effort.

User avatar
Moctecus
156
Joined: 28 Oct 2015, 13:08
Location: Germany

Re: Williams FW48

Post

For comparison, here's the FW47:

Image

This is what Vowles said during their recent VTT:
“We’ve got quite a different cooling system for us here than we’ve designed and used beforehand, and it allows us not just current learning to make sure we use it effectively – we also have to remember we had some reliability woes last year, and I wanted to make sure that those were all gone – but also future learning on the sizing of it and packaging of it for future states. So that’s been incredibly useful.” [source]

Brahmal
Brahmal
58
Joined: 19 Oct 2024, 05:07

Re: Williams FW48

Post

tomazy wrote:
13 Feb 2026, 20:38
Surely the cable managment can be managed better?
Lol yeah, maybe they got lost chasing wires when they couldn't make the shakedown. Makes you wonder where Aston Martin is putting all that stuff?

Ferdecarreras
Ferdecarreras
1
Joined: 19 Feb 2022, 16:28

Re: Williams FW48

Post

tomazy wrote:
13 Feb 2026, 20:38
Surely the cable managment can be managed better?
I think is common to have a huge amount of badly managed wiring during testing, I am talking for all teams. They are not part of the wiring harness of the car, but more so they can quickly install and connect aero racks, Temp. Cameras, sensors and so on.

Brahmal
Brahmal
58
Joined: 19 Oct 2024, 05:07

Re: Williams FW48

Post


Brahmal
Brahmal
58
Joined: 19 Oct 2024, 05:07

Re: Williams FW48

Post


User avatar
roadie
39
Joined: 08 Feb 2011, 13:52

Re: Williams FW48

Post

Thanks for all the photos. I appreciate JV's comments in that it looks too be conservative to avoid cooling issues. Hopefully the team can find a good baseline and slimline accordingly.

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
565
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: Williams FW48

Post

Very basic looking aerodynamics after diverting resources so early to get a head start. Very disappointing. Let's see how they develop in the opening races.
🖐️✌️☝️👀👌✍️🐎🏆🙏

Racing Green in 2028

User avatar
roadie
39
Joined: 08 Feb 2011, 13:52

Re: Williams FW48

Post

Probably a fair comment in terms of the car appearing conservative given how early the team stopped development on the previous car.

I wonder whether that is a product of parts being delayed or slow given the issues the team had getting the car to the shakedown?

User avatar
MIKEY_!
9
Joined: 10 Jul 2011, 03:07

Re: Williams FW48

Post

"Very basic aero" seems a bit harsh to me, despite the high expectations created by switching focus to 2026 so early. There is some interesting complexity with the varying camber of the front suspension shrouds, the unusual and relatively complex bib stay, the winglets behind the roll hoop, the cutout on the back of the floor board, and the double swages on the rear wing endplate. If the car was working well we'd be oohing and ahhing over these details.

But the car is slow, the sidepods are bulky and bland, and the roll hoop looks the same as previous years. Hopefully we'll get a better picture of the aero performance once they sort the weight issues out.

Farnborough
Farnborough
139
Joined: 18 Mar 2023, 14:15

Re: Williams FW48

Post

Ferdecarreras wrote:
13 Feb 2026, 22:01
tomazy wrote:
13 Feb 2026, 20:38
Surely the cable managment can be managed better?
I think is common to have a huge amount of badly managed wiring during testing, I am talking for all teams. They are not part of the wiring harness of the car, but more so they can quickly install and connect aero racks, Temp. Cameras, sensors and so on.
They can run presure taps on floor etc during testing, needing extraneous wiring loom to facilitate this. Likey not incorporated in race build specifications.

Farnborough
Farnborough
139
Joined: 18 Mar 2023, 14:15

Re: Williams FW48

Post

MIKEY_! wrote:
28 Feb 2026, 08:44
"Very basic aero" seems a bit harsh to me, despite the high expectations created by switching focus to 2026 so early. There is some interesting complexity with the varying camber of the front suspension shrouds, the unusual and relatively complex bib stay, the winglets behind the roll hoop, the cutout on the back of the floor board, and the double swages on the rear wing endplate. If the car was working well we'd be oohing and ahhing over these details.

But the car is slow, the sidepods are bulky and bland, and the roll hoop looks the same as previous years. Hopefully we'll get a better picture of the aero performance once they sort the weight issues out.
Unusual in that previously these have been supported by a "suspension " device to allow for track strike, which doesn't appear to be facilitated in this design.

Has anything changed in rules this season to prevent such ?

User avatar
porridge
2
Joined: 04 Feb 2026, 19:41

Re: Williams FW48

Post

Last edited by porridge on 05 Mar 2026, 16:39, edited 2 times in total.