It is safe to assume that having hired a few people from Mercedes, Renault and Ferrari, having a lot more budget and people and a full year of testing they will improve by a significant margin.Sevach wrote:But now he reeeeally means it... Who's to say he's not doing more motivational speech then?
I'm not betting any money on Honda having a competitive engine.
Yes, they will improve for sure. No one doubts that. But they need 2sec in average to compete for Q3 next year.Joseki wrote:It is safe to assume that having hired a few people from Mercedes, Renault and Ferrari, having a lot more budget and people and a full year of testing they will improve by a significant margin.
No it's not.Joseki wrote:It is safe to assume that having hired a few people from Mercedes, Renault and Ferrari, having a lot more budget and people and a full year of testing they will improve by a significant margin.Sevach wrote:But now he reeeeally means it... Who's to say he's not doing more motivational speech then?
I'm not betting any money on Honda having a competitive engine.
It's because the guy tried to steal intellectual propertySevach wrote:Joseki wrote:(gardening leaves are looong these days, just look at the guy getting sued by Mercedes).
http://www.f1analisitecnica.com/2015/11 ... e.html?m=1Sevach wrote:No it's not.Joseki wrote:It is safe to assume that having hired a few people from Mercedes, Renault and Ferrari, having a lot more budget and people and a full year of testing they will improve by a significant margin.Sevach wrote:But now he reeeeally means it... Who's to say he's not doing more motivational speech then?
I'm not betting any money on Honda having a competitive engine.
Wasn't it against Honda culture to just hire people, Honda being pretty much dead against it?
And even if they were convinced to hire some guys (if you have some info about guys hired by Honda please share), they still need to be able to make it work within the token system and reasonable time to implement it (gardening leaves are looong these days, just look at the guy getting sued by Mercedes).
One can always hopeME4ME wrote:But they won't get Alonso, certainly not in 2016.nokivasara wrote:I bet Renault will finish higher than Mclaren in the WCC 2016, at least if they get ALO.
As for you bet, I think Mclaren will quite easily beat Renault in 2016.
He's being sued for the IP, the gardening leave of 1 year plus has nothing to do with it, it's just standard behaviour in F1.ME4ME wrote:It's because the guy tried to steal intellectual propertySevach wrote:Joseki wrote:(gardening leaves are looong these days, just look at the guy getting sued by Mercedes).![]()
Also the amount of tokens for the season has increased. In-season development has been allowed and locked development areas have been unlocked. I'm no fan of Mclaren-Honda but it would be foolish to count them out on the back of what was mostly a testing season. As Alonso has stated, it is very clear what the problem is. They know what to do. The resources and the will are there. It's a matter of time.
PlatinumZealot wrote:It is total that is pushing him out I think. Renault wants to have more control over the branding of the car. And Total is a big partner of theirs.
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/122473...But as time progressed, and with the deal to takeover Lotus drawing towards a conclusion, Renault then took stock of the sponsors it wanted to be associated with.
At the time there was still debate as to which sponsors to bring on board, that included Venezuela's state-owned oil and gas giant PDVSA that has supported Maldonado's motorsport career for many years.
Renault felt with significant livery changes to be made to the car - scheduled to be unveiled in early February - affecting the available space on it, that would in turn change the existing contract.
...
You do realize Perez was in his 3rd F1 season and Magnussen in his first, right?FrukostScones wrote:also, MAG is overrated ...didn't PER perform mich bette ragainst BUT than MAG did...
Golden boys always deliver. MAG is merely silver. or bronze?ME4ME wrote:You do realize Perez was in his 3rd F1 season and Magnussen in his first, right?FrukostScones wrote:also, MAG is overrated ...didn't PER perform mich bette ragainst BUT than MAG did...
I think Kevin deserves another chance. Not immediately at a top team, but somewhere in the middle of the pack so he can prove his worth. Renault would be a good place for him.