
0.2s in one single corner is a colossal amountAR3-GP wrote: ↑13 Feb 2026, 05:02He only lost 2 tenths, not "massive". Nighttime track is massively faster than daytime track. The comparison is of course irrelevant, but we do know that Mclaren is running in a more reserved state when their best lap in the night is slower than someone else's best lap in the day time.
It’s a shame we can’t see leclerc’s full run (unless I’m reading this wrong, seems like we lost timing). The Race gave the following comparison:
Stella was really in awe of it. I think the second and thrid stints were very strong.f1316 wrote: ↑13 Feb 2026, 23:58It’s a shame we can’t see leclerc’s full run (unless I’m reading this wrong, seems like we lost timing). The Race gave the following comparison:
STINT 1
Antonelli - Soft, 16 laps (1m40.128s avg)
Hamilton - Soft, 17 laps (1m40.280s avg)
Piastri - Soft, 11 laps (1m40.947s avg)
Stint 2
Antonelli - Hard, 12 laps* (1m38.547s avg)
Hamilton - Hard, 17 laps (1m38.929s avg)
Piastri - Medium, 20 laps (1m39.604s avg)
Stint 3
Hamilton - Medium, 6 laps* (1m37.461s avg)
Piastri - Hard, 18 laps* (1m38.472s avg)
But I think Charles’ race sim (set at a similar time of day, as opposed to Russel’s) seemed better than Hamilton’s, from what I can tell.
I am inclined to believe Mercs are hiding their paceEmag wrote: ↑13 Feb 2026, 17:57At the moment Ferrari looks a lot like McLaren looked last year. They set effortless quick laptimes on low fuel and they have one really impressive race sim in Charles Leclerc yesterday (but Lewis' run today was not too shabby either).SoulPancake13 wrote: ↑13 Feb 2026, 17:42For those who care, Mercedes said George's morning stint was 26 seconds slower than Leclerc's race sim yesterday in the afternoon.
If it weren't for all these engine shenanigans, I don't see why you wouldn't put Ferrari as the leading team at the moment.
I think it will get better, they might either increase the compression ratio rule to 18:1 again in a few years or if its too bad maybe go to a 60:40 split. Lets see. But I agree, the first few qualifying sessions and race sessions will be ---, with clipping on every straight
It was already difficult to make predictions with the previous generation of cars, let alone today. I think it’s easy to hide the true potential of a car in many different ways.
As for us, I’m happy with how we are carrying out our program. So far we haven’t had any reliability issues, and that’s a key factor to start the season well. At the moment everything is in line with our expectations. I think we have a good base to work from and improve.
Regarding our rivals, there’s Red Bull, which has shown really impressive things in terms of power unit, especially here in Bahrain. Mercedes has also shown, at times, very interesting signs, and in this specific case I would say they are hiding quite a lot. To close the circle, I see those two teams a bit ahead, then us and probably McLaren, which so far has been difficult to interpret.
I can’t say it’s the most fun car I’ve ever driven, but I’m finding the fun in a different way. I find it very interesting to develop something completely new. It’s nice to be able to think a bit outside the box and try to find new solutions to maximize the car’s performance. But the real pleasure of driving it is something else.
A Formula 1 driver must always be ready to accept a change in driving style. This year there is really a lot that is new, but I think that is mainly due to the amount of work we have to do when we are in the car. The percentage of pure driving is slightly lower. Now we think a lot about how to make the most of all the systems around us. You have to actively think much more than in the past, but from a driving point of view it’s something we’re used to. Even when you go from qualifying to the race, and we saw it last year, you change your driving style a lot.
I think it’s the new feature I appreciate more than anything else. The car is a bit more lively and the balance is better. You can play more with the car, having a very reactive rear end. Last year the weight was more difficult to manage and, personally, I have always liked oversteering cars.
I share what my colleagues have said. At the moment I find it extremely difficult to overtake, but with time we could improve the management of these kinds of situations. Every overtake comes with a price to pay, and I think today the price is much higher than in the past. It won’t be easy to pass a rival and immediately create a gap as happened until last year. It will be more complicated.
yes, a very informed YouTube Italian channel said that they will bring a new engine cover that will be more extreme, more tight to the power unit and other things, some visible, some not.
How much faster was Leclerc's compared to Hamilton's?f1316 wrote: ↑13 Feb 2026, 23:58It’s a shame we can’t see leclerc’s full run (unless I’m reading this wrong, seems like we lost timing). The Race gave the following comparison:
STINT 1
Antonelli - Soft, 16 laps (1m40.128s avg)
Hamilton - Soft, 17 laps (1m40.280s avg)
Piastri - Soft, 11 laps (1m40.947s avg)
Stint 2
Antonelli - Hard, 12 laps* (1m38.547s avg)
Hamilton - Hard, 17 laps (1m38.929s avg)
Piastri - Medium, 20 laps (1m39.604s avg)
Stint 3
Hamilton - Medium, 6 laps* (1m37.461s avg)
Piastri - Hard, 18 laps* (1m38.472s avg)
But I think Charles’ race sim (set at a similar time of day, as opposed to Russel’s) seemed better than Hamilton’s, from what I can tell.