Well Ferrari did split their strategy. And then kept their faster driver on softs behind the slower one. Go figure. Ferrari are a repeating example of why "The team know best" doesn't really ring true. At the end of the day they are human and can make bad calls. Not sure if todays was, but it sure doesn't make sense on face value.Peter Piper wrote: ↑17 Sep 2023, 20:31Sorry, I wasn't clear. I meant a split strategy for either Ferrari or Mercedes. You're right that the McLaren's were far enough apart for that to make no sense.mwillems wrote: ↑17 Sep 2023, 18:55I don't think split strategy had any benefit here.Peter Piper wrote: ↑17 Sep 2023, 18:16
Quite true, the teams have a vast amount of data to base their decisions on and in the majority of cases will make the right decision in hindsight.
I think the only thing that gets me sometimes is the reluctance to split strategies if the pit strategy decision isn't obvious. Like today, when it seemed like there was an argument for either strategy at the end Ferrari went all in on staying out while Mercedes went the opposite way with both cars.
Different for Monza. They were always stuck behind Albon on track at Monza therefore covering no one so the ultimate.ate choice to pit the following driver didn't make sense and they could have sent one to attack Albon with an undercut. If they got ahead and needed a second stop they may well have had plenty of clean air to make the gap.
I'd need to look at the data, but where do you think Merc needed to split the strategy? Their call looked pretty spot on, they weren't getting past Lando on the same old tyres and were not far away from taking a 1-2 but for some brave and clever driving from Carlos, ably assisted by Lando.