dren wrote: ↑17 Apr 2017, 22:03
godlameroso wrote: ↑17 Apr 2017, 21:59
dren wrote: ↑17 Apr 2017, 21:30
Honda builds excellent V6 ICEs, I know, I own one. Honda certainly has experience jumping from single cylinder test engines to V6s. If the results surprised them, then they really were caught off with the new combustion interaction with the other two cylinders shared.
V6 in the Accord/TSX/Oddesy? V6 in the old NSX, or the new one? V6 in the Acura Legend? Maybe you mean the 2.8 V6 from their LMP2 program which was derived from a street engine? I don't think any of those were 90 degree V6's.
It's a J35. All J series have 60 deg bank angles. The C series all had 90 degree bank angles. The C series is what was in the original NSX.
I'll jump in here haha. I've got an NA1 NSX which has the C30A. I can confirm that's a 90 degree V6 and even in this day and age, I find it a phenomenal 6-cylinder at that! (sorry off topic)
Honestly, every time something has happened with this power unit, Hasegawa's comment on the RA617H's development last year rings in my head clearly..
"The new architecture for the RA617H is very high risk, this is the only way to catch up to Mercedes, but the technology we implemented into the design, we do not fully understand just yet and it will take time to fully realise potential".
We just have to ignore the fanfare and media blowups about any issues with each GP, we knew this would probably happen but we stick with them, they know what needs doing and we have to trust that.
And I'll also admit, I don't have the technical skill that some guys have here but I like to think I'm pretty well read, well enough to have a little chat. Otherwise I find a lot of the content here fascinating and I read every bit of it but I'll stay quiet. Anyway onwards and upwards!