![Image](https://imgr1.auto-motor-und-sport.de/Ferrari-Formel-1-GP-Belgien-Spa-Francorchamps-25-Juli-2024-bigMobileWideGallery2x-bf7443a0-2127377.jpg)
The front wings of the Ferrari cars are lot less flexible vertically, than for example the Merc ones. Your clip shows this perfectly.
I dont think so because it sounds like more flex or wobbling is more clever and less honest. under the rules and tests they are ok. teams usually test their stuff before they go on the track to be save. the only problem is the test. a static test on a race car to check flexible wings does make not so much sence. a dynamic test would be better but not easy to do at 360km/h or 100m/s in Monza, with and without DRS, or in corners like Eau Rouge, R130 and so on. they should be able to make a dynamic test on a full round of a course but how can teams develope correct parts on 50 or 60% WT models without testing in adult size on a track? everything is in motion also if we cant see it with an eye without special tools.
Sorry but from this slow motion we can see that he didn't attack that much kerbs which cause wobbling, and we cannot know if this was taken during prep lap what speeds were taken. I mean...
Literally two edges to that, and good question.
This shows the the relative structure used in that wing mounting/form/deformation characteristics built into each teams component.F1NAC wrote: ↑29 Jul 2024, 11:45Sorry but from this slow motion we can see that he didn't attack that much kerbs which cause wobbling, and we cannot know if this was taken during prep lap what speeds were taken. I mean...
The point were flexing comes in hand occurs at high speeds on the straights were flaps kinda reduce angle of attack. What is the point of looking at them at low speed?
Have FIA book a wind tunnel session at the teams' expense and test the actual wings before introduction?SICK AL SPEEDSHOP wrote: ↑28 Jul 2024, 23:24I dont think so because it sounds like more flex or wobbling is more clever and less honest. under the rules and tests they are ok. teams usually test their stuff before they go on the track to be save. the only problem is the test. a static test on a race car to check flexible wings does make not so much sence. a dynamic test would be better but not easy to do at 360km/h or 100m/s in Monza, with and without DRS, or in corners like Eau Rouge, R130 and so on. they should be able to make a dynamic test on a full round of a course but how can teams develope correct parts on 50 or 60% WT models without testing in adult size on a track? everything is in motion also if we cant see it with an eye without special tools.
I would like to see all front wings in the same corner, especially of the RB20.
I don't see anything here that might be beneficial, which I guess means I don't see anything here that looks intentional.
It looks to me like they put some kind of patch, not a completely new floor.Vanja #66 wrote: ↑06 Aug 2024, 10:30Piola's photo of Hungary/Spa floor. It seems the rear lateral kick section (towards diffuser) was part of the changes after Silverstone, judging by carbon reinforcement strips
https://cdn-4.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... etail.webp
Launch spec floor bellow, for comparison
CouncilorIrissa wrote: ↑08 Mar 2024, 20:33A floor photo, albeit from the wrong side:
https://preview.redd.it/julien-simon-ch ... 8341aee1a7