Why bother with high DF aero.
It simply adds drag and reduces range.
My original idea for FE had no wings or chassis down force.
The electrical drive is the road relevant part, not aircraft aero.
I was going to agree with you finally, but if a fan could solve the problem then I see no reason to use it. They don´t need to be pointing to the helmet of the car chasing you. Or a simple filter could solve it toowesley123 wrote:Which brings the issue of debris being thrown up, plus packaging the whole thing.mrluke wrote:You could use a fan to have consistent down force..
Not to mention fan is pretty fallible. A blade breaks and the whole thing falls apart immediately. And bye-bye downforce.wesley123 wrote:Which brings the issue of debris being thrown up, plus packaging the whole thing.mrluke wrote:You could use a fan to have consistent down force..
I don't think that a no df formula with a lot slower cornering speeds would have the same kind of appeal.autogyro wrote:Why bother with high DF aero.
It simply adds drag and reduces range.
My original idea for FE had no wings or chassis down force.
The electrical drive is the road relevant part, not aircraft aero.
Which would get filled with debris over time and get clogged up, reducing the effectiveness of the fan, which brings us all the way back to the beginning; inconsistent and unpredictable downforce.Andres125sx wrote:Or a simple filter could solve it toowesley123 wrote:Which brings the issue of debris being thrown up, plus packaging the whole thing.mrluke wrote:You could use a fan to have consistent down force..
It is probably just to connect it with top-flight motor-sport and such.autogyro wrote:Why bother with high DF aero.
It simply adds drag and reduces range.
My original idea for FE had no wings or chassis down force.
The electrical drive is the road relevant part, not aircraft aero.
You forget the very difficult kink between T7 and T8hollus wrote:Why? It has all sorts of corners, from 85 degree corners to 95 degree corners, both left and right!