Emag wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025, 01:41
Badger wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025, 01:24
Nice, but it's probably not specific enough if it yields a 10 that often. Calibrate it so that only the very best season yields a 10. Take 2025 or 2023 for example as the benchmark for Max. Would be way more useful that way.
I actually did try some options which applied harsher penalties on consistency and bad results, however Max turned out the best in those as well, just with a high 9s score. In the end, the ranking didn't change much actually, that's why I decided to use this last iteration which applied some saturation and granted a 10 for any season that, at least statistically speaking, was pretty much as good as it can get.
Yeah but it's not as interesting if you can't differentiate between good and great. Max in 2018 was definitely not the same as Max in 2025.
