No
Honda tried that back in the day with Bar/Honda ... They had a 2nd hidden tank. The idea was that the 2nd tank made them meet the min car weight. The rules included refueling in those days. Once the first tank was empty the car was running under weight. People started to notice that the end of those stints they got really fast.
From what I can gather, there is no restrictions on the oil type, there are restrictions on the fuel composition, however there is still development in the fuel. I'm curious as to what they can develop in the fuel, how do they tailor it to the combustion concept? Do they use lower or higher octane, or special anti-knock additives, or what?
Honda cars, the road ones, not F1, definitely are working with AVL and heavily use the AVL fire/ excite software suite in development... AVL replaced Ricardo Vectis as a development tool at HRAO about 10 years ago...peterg wrote: ↑16 May 2017, 14:51There has been some mention of assistance from Mercedes on the Honda power unit. Although to me it seams far fetched but could be releasing a supplier from a non exclusive arrangement. Can anyone confirm that the original Mercedes Turbo direct injection V6 development engine was designed and built by Advanced Engine Research (AER) Ltd, was AVL originally involved in the combustion design or were they involved later. Does anyone know if Honda are working with AER or AVL on combustion.
There are also no restriction on lubricant infection points or if certain channels can be closed off.godlameroso wrote: ↑16 May 2017, 19:23From what I can gather, there is no restrictions on the oil type, there are restrictions on the fuel composition, however there is still development in the fuel. I'm curious as to what they can develop in the fuel, how do they tailor it to the combustion concept? Do they use lower or higher octane, or special anti-knock additives, or what?
peterg wrote: ↑16 May 2017, 14:51There has been some mention of assistance from Mercedes on the Honda power unit. Although to me it seams far fetched but could be releasing a supplier from a non exclusive arrangement. Can anyone confirm that the original Mercedes Turbo direct injection V6 development engine was designed and built by Advanced Engine Research (AER) Ltd, was AVL originally involved in the combustion design or were they involved later. Does anyone know if Honda are working with AER or AVL on combustion.
From 7-11-2014Germany's Speed Week, and Italian media sources, report that the Japanese manufacturer will have its turbo made by a Tokyo-based company called IHI.
IHI, formerly Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries, has solid links to Mercedes parent Daimler, having set up a joint venture in Germany some years ago to design and manufacture turbo units.
- Honda has also revamped the intake system and injector to the extent that the seal that restricts the development of ICE (engine main body) is not made, and has evolved to "specification 2". This alone achieved about 0.13 seconds in lap time, nearly 10 kW (about 13.6 horsepower) performance improvement in output. This is never a small advance, as the general improvement of the power unit over the year is 30 to 50 hp
- Hasegawa: "The update is similar to the specification 2 that we launched in last year's British Grand Prix, but the power improvement range is bigger than that, it can be said that it is big enough as an update during the season, especially low Since the output on the rotating side has increased greatly, it is clear from the data that the oscillation (resonance) of the rotation number is considerably improved as the effect."
- Matt Morris: "There is still a difference of 2 seconds from the top, which is a big difference, I know how many seconds I have lost with the power unit, and I am satisfied with the competitive (competitive state) as a chassis It is not yet perfect and there are places to improve both aerodynamically and mechanically.It needs more effort to catch up with the Mercedes AMG and Ferrari which are coming out of the other team but although we are also in the car body I think it is possible to catch up behind them."
- Matt Morris: "We have a 70 kW difference against Mercedes AMG because they will increase the output by 15 to 20 kW in the qualifying session.Sochi has a large power effect (the effect on the output time) is large, usually about 0.2 It will be about 0.25 sec / 10 kW at the time of sec / 10 kW, which means ... you can figure it out by calculating it?
- In other words, in the Russian GP, 1.75 seconds out of the 3 seconds difference is said to be the power unit, the remaining 1.25 seconds was the difference of the car body. As the performance of the car "4th place not to Red Bull" (Morris), the difference with the middle group such as Williams and Renault was also quite small.
# translated by Google
From: https://sportiva.shueisha.co.jp/clm/mot ... /index.php