The the switch to paid programming isn't a factor at all. I'm Canadian and I have no way to legally watch live F1 except for the US and Canadian GPs.xpensive wrote:Doesn't matter what you think either, Formula 1 has almost totally lost its lure to the public and sponsors, with or without wings.turbof1 wrote:No offense, but you aren't "everybody". For me F1 without wings would be hideous. And as said the wings are there for a performance reason. F1 isn't drag racing.xpensive wrote:As long as the cars hit 370 km/h on the straights, everybody will be happy, while nobody can tell if they are slower in the corners.
Besides, it will all be compensated by close racing.
If SKY offered their live streaming to people not on their UK subscriptions world wide, viewership would explode. Say, for example, there was a F1-Only plan that was ~$50 for the season and that allowed to to have a lag free, HD stream of all SkyF1 programming? Cheap enough that the people that don't have cable TV to watch it with quality online. Or $5 for each race weekend to get full programming coverage.
F1 and Sky just hate money though.