This is compared to last year. Also there is more proof from paddock pics or rear wing and front wing that the car is on the extreme end of the low drag scale. Complete Opposite to the top four teams.
This is so unusual. Any ideas on what the reason might be for the "pinching" of the intake? I'd like to believe it's more deliberate than just following the shape of the upper indentation.hollus wrote: ↑23 Mar 2025, 10:50A good angle of the shape of the intake in the Astons, from the race feed when Alonso retired:
https://i.imgur.com/my4iV2x.jpeg
The don't need the cooling.Waz wrote: ↑25 Mar 2025, 10:04This is so unusual. Any ideas on what the reason might be for the "pinching" of the intake? I'd like to believe it's more deliberate than just following the shape of the upper indentation.hollus wrote: ↑23 Mar 2025, 10:50A good angle of the shape of the intake in the Astons, from the race feed when Alonso retired:
https://i.imgur.com/my4iV2x.jpeg
Getting really hard to find pictures these days.wiktor977 wrote: ↑02 May 2025, 22:37Old rear wing
https://i.postimg.cc/k4kjcQGx/old-RW.jpg
New rear wing
https://i.postimg.cc/NFmdPK2Z/new-RW.jpg
Old beam wing
https://i.postimg.cc/xTGsvb2z/OLD-BEAM.jpg
New beam wing
https://i.postimg.cc/LXZDnJDh/NEW-BEAM.jpg
They were running flow-vis paint but only on the 'old' parts with Lancewiktor977 wrote: ↑02 May 2025, 22:37Old rear wing
https://i.postimg.cc/k4kjcQGx/old-RW.jpg
New rear wing
https://i.postimg.cc/NFmdPK2Z/new-RW.jpg
Old beam wing
https://i.postimg.cc/xTGsvb2z/OLD-BEAM.jpg
New beam wing
https://i.postimg.cc/LXZDnJDh/NEW-BEAM.jpg