If playing golf puts Renault ahead of Honda in terms of intangibles, then I'm not surprised Renault are still behind Ferrari and MercedesPlatinumZealot wrote: ↑13 Jun 2018, 09:22Intangibles: Non-physical things around the engine package. Communication, support, response time, proven track-record, familiarity, flexibility to demands, golf game invites, marketability, similarity of parts should streamline work etc. Whatever you can think of that is not the physical engine or the cash around it (I count cash as tangible - it's physical you can see it, count it, smell it whatever). The intangibles will take time to evaluate thoroughly because there are positives and negatives between the two manufacturers. Obviously I'm not an insider, but I would put Renault slightly ahead just for now mainly for familiarity and the short time Honda has to rebuild their F1 reputation.
well they must of did something to the ICE processing beside increasing the output by 25 hp , now how about another 10 hp from upgrading the fuel...hasika wrote: ↑13 Jun 2018, 08:36https://members.f1-life.net/report/70330/
The journalist said he had learn from Honda engineer that the upgrade didnt bring the rumored 30kw(40.8hp),but just a litte bit less than 20kw(27.2hp).
So I think it seems to be around 25hp.
An "intangible"... well more tangible was that Honda changed the whole PU in 2 hours and have the car ready for the qualy, something really unthinkable a couple of years ago, even last year in think.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑13 Jun 2018, 09:22Intangibles: Non-physical things around the engine package. Communication, support, response time, proven track-record, familiarity, flexibility to demands, golf game invites, marketability, similarity of parts should streamline work etc. Whatever you can think of that is not the physical engine or the cash around it (I count cash as tangible - it's physical you can see it, count it, smell it whatever). The intangibles will take time to evaluate thoroughly because there are positives and negatives between the two manufacturers. Obviously I'm not an insider, but I would put Renault slightly ahead just for now mainly for familiarity and the short time Honda has to rebuild their F1 reputation.
Redbull and STR uses Esso/Mobil 1 fuel right?? Maybe when Redbull have new fuel, STR too and will be another small gain thereloner wrote: ↑13 Jun 2018, 14:56well they must of did something to the ICE processing beside increasing the output by 25 hp , now how about another 10 hp from upgrading the fuel...hasika wrote: ↑13 Jun 2018, 08:36https://members.f1-life.net/report/70330/
The journalist said he had learn from Honda engineer that the upgrade didnt bring the rumored 30kw(40.8hp),but just a litte bit less than 20kw(27.2hp).
So I think it seems to be around 25hp.
yess they doMarti_EF3 wrote: ↑13 Jun 2018, 17:13Redbull and STR uses Esso/Mobil 1 fuel right?? Maybe when Redbull have new fuel, STR too and will be another small gain thereloner wrote: ↑13 Jun 2018, 14:56well they must of did something to the ICE processing beside increasing the output by 25 hp , now how about another 10 hp from upgrading the fuel...hasika wrote: ↑13 Jun 2018, 08:36https://members.f1-life.net/report/70330/
The journalist said he had learn from Honda engineer that the upgrade didnt bring the rumored 30kw(40.8hp),but just a litte bit less than 20kw(27.2hp).
So I think it seems to be around 25hp.
There are a lot of things sorted out on a golf course.Revs84 wrote: ↑13 Jun 2018, 11:27If playing golf puts Renault ahead of Honda in terms of intangibles, then I'm not surprised Renault are still behind Ferrari and MercedesPlatinumZealot wrote: ↑13 Jun 2018, 09:22Intangibles: Non-physical things around the engine package. Communication, support, response time, proven track-record, familiarity, flexibility to demands, golf game invites, marketability, similarity of parts should streamline work etc. Whatever you can think of that is not the physical engine or the cash around it (I count cash as tangible - it's physical you can see it, count it, smell it whatever). The intangibles will take time to evaluate thoroughly because there are positives and negatives between the two manufacturers. Obviously I'm not an insider, but I would put Renault slightly ahead just for now mainly for familiarity and the short time Honda has to rebuild their F1 reputation.
yeah i read they will have it at the Hungarian GP with fine tuning the new PU i think we are talking about easly more 15 hp from both feul and mapping.Marti_EF3 wrote: ↑13 Jun 2018, 17:13Redbull and STR uses Esso/Mobil 1 fuel right?? Maybe when Redbull have new fuel, STR too and will be another small gain thereloner wrote: ↑13 Jun 2018, 14:56well they must of did something to the ICE processing beside increasing the output by 25 hp , now how about another 10 hp from upgrading the fuel...hasika wrote: ↑13 Jun 2018, 08:36https://members.f1-life.net/report/70330/
The journalist said he had learn from Honda engineer that the upgrade didnt bring the rumored 30kw(40.8hp),but just a litte bit less than 20kw(27.2hp).
So I think it seems to be around 25hp.
Would you have trusted him with a club while Honda people were within reach