I always though the same, that MGU-H TC and ICE are matched and tuned together an replaced as a set. But it seems otherwise and the new ICE will use an older TC/H.
If you take an additional element, you are not allowed to stock them up. If he takes Nr. 5, the Nr. 4 is eliminated and can not be used anymore. So this does not make sense unless Nr. 4 is defective like it was for Bot.atanatizante wrote: ↑08 Oct 2021, 10:54Is this new ICE running right now at the FP1 or should be put it in place after the FP3?
What if they are running it now and then another one before qualy? He could get another 10 places grid penalty?
Not sure whether the thinking is to take parts over a few races? Not to take away from VERs recovery in Sochi, but he was never in contention to better HAM let alone a win. Maybe this leaves the pressure on RB/VER a bit more.Tvetovnato wrote: ↑08 Oct 2021, 10:53Could it be wiser to just change all parts instead? Starting right in the middle of the pack is not really an ideal place, given the risk for incidents..
That would be mad wouldn't it? You're just conceding the win race after race by constantly giving yourself grid penalties. Far better to just do all the pain in one race.214270 wrote: ↑08 Oct 2021, 11:16Not sure whether the thinking is to take parts over a few races? Not to take away from VERs recovery in Sochi, but he was never in contention to better HAM let alone a win. Maybe this leaves the pressure on RB/VER a bit more.Tvetovnato wrote: ↑08 Oct 2021, 10:53Could it be wiser to just change all parts instead? Starting right in the middle of the pack is not really an ideal place, given the risk for incidents..
The calculus would be that 10 positions is not enough of a penalty to remove the possibility of a HAM win. I guess it depends if VER qualifies ahead and is allowed to run & hide. Either way, it’s a better way to maximise the strengths/motivations. HAM usually has blistering race pace & can make up the deficit and BOT is up front & hungry, staring at maybe his final ever win. I think this is more sensible way to play the BOT hand. Just my musingsEl Scorchio wrote: ↑08 Oct 2021, 11:52That would be mad wouldn't it? You're just conceding the win race after race by constantly giving yourself grid penalties. Far better to just do all the pain in one race.214270 wrote: ↑08 Oct 2021, 11:16Not sure whether the thinking is to take parts over a few races? Not to take away from VERs recovery in Sochi, but he was never in contention to better HAM let alone a win. Maybe this leaves the pressure on RB/VER a bit more.Tvetovnato wrote: ↑08 Oct 2021, 10:53Could it be wiser to just change all parts instead? Starting right in the middle of the pack is not really an ideal place, given the risk for incidents..
You can "stock" them provided you take all your penalties. The rule to stop "stocking" was when Honda was taking two or three complete sets and only serving one "back of the grid" penalty. Although now I think about it even if he qualified on pole he couldn't serve two ten place grid drops ...basti313 wrote: ↑08 Oct 2021, 11:15If you take an additional element, you are not allowed to stock them up. If he takes Nr. 5, the Nr. 4 is eliminated and can not be used anymore. So this does not make sense unless Nr. 4 is defective like it was for Bot.atanatizante wrote: ↑08 Oct 2021, 10:54Is this new ICE running right now at the FP1 or should be put it in place after the FP3?
What if they are running it now and then another one before qualy? He could get another 10 places grid penalty?
With Mercedes having the dominating car he should qualy P1, and finish P2 at worst in my opinionpursue_one's wrote: ↑08 Oct 2021, 12:04(Sky Sports F1)Andrew Shovlin said that if Lewis qualifies in sixth or seventh they won't go for additional power unit elements because they are happy with the decision to take a new ICE only.