Will an F1 team reading this PLEASE reach out to this company and built an F1 proof of concept?!? 2700hp!
https://techcrunch-com.cdn.ampproject.o ... -planes%2F
fuel consumed per mile doesn't get much worse than helicopters.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑24 May 2021, 16:39True, although on a business "jet" it's mostly going to be adults most of the time.
I like the idea of it. I do wonder if it'll find many companies taking it on for routes they cover. 400nm isn't a huge range and within existing helicopter coverage.
True, but the ranges are comparable which was what I was getting at.humble sabot wrote: ↑15 Sep 2021, 01:29fuel consumed per mile doesn't get much worse than helicopters.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑24 May 2021, 16:39True, although on a business "jet" it's mostly going to be adults most of the time.
I like the idea of it. I do wonder if it'll find many companies taking it on for routes they cover. 400nm isn't a huge range and within existing helicopter coverage.
I never had a cool petrol car, so I can't really compare. The BMW i3 was the most powerful and fun car I had ever driven when I got it.125 kW instant power, always available. Who the hell wants turbo lag, clutches, wrong RPM, manual gear, vibrations etc? So much effort done over the years to minimize those shortcomings on the ICE. And I can still pump the pedal if I want unlinear acceleration, or take one hand off the steering wheel to mimic a manual transmission. For me, gear shifting is just an annoyance to the real driving experience. Driving is done with accelerator pedal, brakes and steering wheel. Gear shifts are just disturbing. And one more thing with the i3, it's made of carbon fibre. How cool isn't that!? Perfect for a racing fan. It's the closest I will ever get to a supercar. And no corrosion.JordanMugen wrote:Do you miss the last time you had a petrol hot hatch (or sportscar) with an internal combustion engine and manual transmission? I don't feel ready to give it up yet, it's so much fun snicking through the gears, stabbing the throttle to an instant bellow from the exhaust (no turbos here!) and rev matching downshifts on every single drive.Ferry wrote: I'm doing both! Heat pump up on my wall, two BEVs outside, 98% renewable in the socket. At the same time exporting to Denmark, Germany, Netherlands, UK.
There is no turbo lag in a naturally aspirated ICE, vibrations are minimal thanks to balance shafts, and choosing the right gear is half of the fun!
Sadly, the only electric vehicles I have driven are the Toyota Camry Hybrid in electric mode which was unremarkable, and an electric hire go-kart, also unremarkable (I thought it was supposed to have better torque response than a petrol hire go-kart, but it did not). Plus the electric hire scooters (Bird type things).
You say the gear shifts and engine characteristics are an annoyance, which is fair enough, but I strongly disagree. They are the fun.
But is it or the S or an old Tesla Roadster as fun as Ferrari 360 ICE with a manual transmission, even though the Ferrari is a much slower and less powerful car (or even compared to a later Ferrari 458 that only comes in automatic)? Or a like-vs-like comparison would be say a Model S against Maserati Quattroporte... Is the Tesla as fun to drive as the Maserati?
I'm a fan of renewables - especially off shore wind turbines and tidal turbines - but also a fan of nuclear. It should form a central core of a grown up "green" energy system.nzjrs wrote: ↑11 Oct 2021, 19:42Nice update on the best laid plans of mice and men
https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/10/08/en ... e-climate/
(No great surprise to many here)
Tell that to the Yankees! The land of drag racing. Accelleration used to be everything. Seems to be downplayed later years, for some reason Now it's all about range. As if anyone ever cared...JordanMugen wrote: ↑09 Oct 2021, 22:06Flooring it is not what it's about, it's about driving it, surely?
Fair enough, we don' have to agree on that. Gears shifting has never been of my interest. I have always loved Porsche. Much because of their innovation and high tech approach. I had a poster of a 959 on my wall as a kid.You say the gear shifts and engine characteristics are an annoyance, which is fair enough, but I strongly disagree. They are the fun.
I don't know. I don' really see the comparison. A family car compared to a race horse? Guess we're a bit spoiled here, with Tesla model S being a very common car. It's like a VW Passat here now. They even call them "west side Passat".But is it or the S or an old Tesla Roadster as fun as Ferrari 360 ICE with a manual transmission, even though the Ferrari is a much slower and less powerful car ?
It will be interesting, yes. There are a few others too, like the Rimac Nevera, Pininfarina Battista, Lotus Evija, NIO EP9Tesla certainly have made some big, big claims about their second-generation Tesla Roadster sportscar, so it will be interesting to see if it can outsell Ferraris and Porsches, the way their saloon has outsold BMWs and Mercedes.
Many More people have died from burning coal to generate power than from nuclear fission power accidents.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑11 Oct 2021, 21:03I'm a fan of renewables - especially off shore wind turbines and tidal turbines - but also a fan of nuclear. It should form a central core of a grown up "green" energy system.nzjrs wrote: ↑11 Oct 2021, 19:42Nice update on the best laid plans of mice and men
https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/10/08/en ... e-climate/
(No great surprise to many here)
Sadly, too many people believe it to be unsafe / dangerous. Yes, it has some issues around dealing with waste, but the plants themselves are pretty much as safe a system as human can make these days. Many more people die in road traffic accidents in any one year than have ever died as a direct or indirect result of nuclear power plant accidents.
But radiation is scary because a generation or two grew up with the fear of nuclear weapons. That bred a certain view in some that any and all nuclear stuff is dangerous.
Also, if it was possible to calculate, those who have become seriously ill long term or died painfully just from breathing 'burned coal' or even wood.djos wrote: ↑11 Oct 2021, 23:08Many More people have died from burning coal to generate power than from nuclear fission power accidents.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑11 Oct 2021, 21:03I'm a fan of renewables - especially off shore wind turbines and tidal turbines - but also a fan of nuclear. It should form a central core of a grown up "green" energy system.nzjrs wrote: ↑11 Oct 2021, 19:42Nice update on the best laid plans of mice and men
https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/10/08/en ... e-climate/
(No great surprise to many here)
Sadly, too many people believe it to be unsafe / dangerous. Yes, it has some issues around dealing with waste, but the plants themselves are pretty much as safe a system as human can make these days. Many more people die in road traffic accidents in any one year than have ever died as a direct or indirect result of nuclear power plant accidents.
But radiation is scary because a generation or two grew up with the fear of nuclear weapons. That bred a certain view in some that any and all nuclear stuff is dangerous.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... s-research
The 1952 "Great London Smog" is estimated to have killed as many as 12,000 people with ten times as many made seriously ill. That single event was worse than all of the nuclear disasters put together.