djos wrote: ↑14 Dec 2021, 12:10
RBR sensed an opportunity and went for it, how is that not gambling? Mercedes should have covered of max and didn't. instead, they gambled on the race finishing under safety car (which to be fair is what normally happens in these circumstances).
Gambling means you can lose something. Verstappen had nothing to lose as he had a free pitstop on both occasions.
Mercedes could not "cover" Max as they were ahead and they could not pit without risking Max staying out which would certainly happen if Hamilton did not pit. By the time Hamilton went around the lap, VSC ended or Max came too close for Hamilton to pit.
The situation was similar to Norris losing the win in Sochi. Norris was ahead and the team did not risk pitting to lose track position to Hamilton. Once Hamilton pitted it was too late as the gap was too small for Norris to pit on the next lap.
I'm not sure what is there to debate. It's a clear cut situation. Mercedes was conservative but unlucky. Alternative would have been for Mercedes to throw away track position in two situations hoping things go their way. Seeing how Perez defended and with the fact Max led the championship I fail to see how Mercedes could have done anything better.
What they really needed was Bottas on top of his game to make it impossible for Max to pit without losing position.