It just seems rather trivial at this point to dislike EV. It literally ticks all your boxes.Zynerji wrote: ↑27 Jan 2022, 03:02Yep. And it looses its mechanical appeal to me.wesley123 wrote: ↑26 Jan 2022, 23:41EV would literally be the way of efficiency. Also, there is so much that you can do with EV, things that realistically aren't (fully) possible in gasoline cars.Zynerji wrote: ↑26 Jan 2022, 19:20
Sheer, unadulterated, unapologetic purism hubris. The core concept of F1 that captured me as a fan was the mechanical simplification through relentless development. It appeared to me as an artform of design and efficiency. From the elegance of torsion bar suspension to the refined aero of 2008. These expressions of control over the natural laws of the universe are awe inspiring, and invaluable to the fundamentals of design methodology.
It seems inevitable, but I'm sure something purist will come along to capture all of the lost eyeballs that the EV/hybrid drives away from F1.
Sure. But beauty is in the eye of the beholder.wesley123 wrote: ↑28 Jan 2022, 00:56It just seems rather trivial at this point to dislike EV. It literally ticks all your boxes.
"belgh, wings don't belong on racing cars" (And many other comments like that over the history of F1)Zynerji wrote: ↑28 Jan 2022, 03:41Sure. But beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
I like the organic mechanical nature of ultra refined machines. I like them even more when they "overcome" the laws of physics. I also greatly respect the humans that trust them enough to push them to the edge and hold them there.
EV is fine, and obviously the future. It is also sterile and unexciting to me. It simply cannot demand the awe and attention of the 3L v10s from 2005.
But bottling lightning and fire to travel and traverse a course at visceral sounding speed with the barest of adhesion? Yes please!
Meh. My beliefs don't effect F1s direction. Don't worry about my opinion so much. There will always be folks building loud gas burners in their garage. Motorsport is inclusive enough to have both.Jolle wrote: ↑28 Jan 2022, 22:49"belgh, wings don't belong on racing cars" (And many other comments like that over the history of F1)Zynerji wrote: ↑28 Jan 2022, 03:41Sure. But beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
I like the organic mechanical nature of ultra refined machines. I like them even more when they "overcome" the laws of physics. I also greatly respect the humans that trust them enough to push them to the edge and hold them there.
EV is fine, and obviously the future. It is also sterile and unexciting to me. It simply cannot demand the awe and attention of the 3L v10s from 2005.
But bottling lightning and fire to travel and traverse a course at visceral sounding speed with the barest of adhesion? Yes please!
It's progress, and if you like it or not, it's moving forward, like it should. Every time it becomes to "space age", there is a bunch of people saying, oh, its destroyed, this isn't f1 anymore, just start a racing series with etc etc and people will switch over.
Never nobody anywhere did. Not when the car's got wings, not when they were made of plastic, not when you couldn't win a race anymore with a Cosworth, not when you couldn't build an f1 car in a shed, not when the tobacco companies put stickers on there, not when the car's grew from 400 kg to 600.
Two times F1 took a step backwards. Both times they almost lost their status and appeal of being the highest level of motorsport.
Certainly. But even re-reading now I still can´t see any sarcasm. People can´t read your mind if you post just a line with an unaccurate statementZynerji wrote: ↑26 Jan 2022, 15:40I think you missed the sarcasm in my humor in that one...Andres125sx wrote: ↑26 Jan 2022, 09:09Not true in motorsports as recently shown in Dakar
Cristina Gutierrez (driver) was 3rd in T3 category of the toughest race in the world
https://phantom-marca.unidadeditorial.e ... 857363.jpg
Maybe junior-senior would be more appropiatte
Andres125sx wrote: ↑30 Jan 2022, 14:12Certainly. But even re-reading now I still can´t see any sarcasm. People can´t read your mind if you post just a line with an unaccurate statementZynerji wrote: ↑26 Jan 2022, 15:40I think you missed the sarcasm in my humor in that one...Andres125sx wrote: ↑26 Jan 2022, 09:09
Not true in motorsports as recently shown in Dakar
Cristina Gutierrez (driver) was 3rd in T3 category of the toughest race in the world
https://phantom-marca.unidadeditorial.e ... 857363.jpg
Maybe junior-senior would be more appropiatte
No need to downvote just because you failed to show the mood of your post btw
I got the joke, but some members have no sense of irony, let alone sarcasm..Zynerji wrote: ↑30 Jan 2022, 16:03Andres125sx wrote: ↑30 Jan 2022, 14:12Certainly. But even re-reading now I still can´t see any sarcasm. People can´t read your mind if you post just a line with an unaccurate statement
No need to downvote just because you failed to show the mood of your post btw
The joke was that Internal combustion engines were men, and EV are women.
I see the downvotes...
It's like everything else here... Crusaders and Karens unite!
Sometimes, I find that this is the difficulty of international forums. If I would have dropped that line in my friends group, as the absurd metaphor is the context clue, everyone would have immediately understood it as the joke it was, and laughed as they internally unpacked the sarcasm.Andres125sx wrote: ↑30 Jan 2022, 14:12Certainly. But even re-reading now I still can´t see any sarcasm. People can´t read your mind if you post just a line with an unaccurate statementZynerji wrote: ↑26 Jan 2022, 15:40I think you missed the sarcasm in my humor in that one...Andres125sx wrote: ↑26 Jan 2022, 09:09
Not true in motorsports as recently shown in Dakar
Cristina Gutierrez (driver) was 3rd in T3 category of the toughest race in the world
https://phantom-marca.unidadeditorial.e ... 857363.jpg
Maybe junior-senior would be more appropiatte
No need to downvote just because you failed to show the mood of your post btw
In point of fact you've reinforced Zynerji's comment, (as well as mine).Andres125sx wrote: ↑01 Feb 2022, 09:10
You both missed the point, the joke was obvious, but that´s exactly the reason it can be considered machism, its implying men (ICE) are top and women (EV) are second class
IMHO the only reason women are not in F1 is they´re usually less interested in cars, motorsports and racing, so the chances for some with real talent to work a racing career are several orders of magnitude lower
Same as any country dominating some specific sport due to tradition. When a high percentage of population try that sport chances for someone with talent to give it a try are much higher, so more people will reach the top. But that does not mean other countries can´t reach the top, only that few people give it a try so it´s almost a coincidence if some with real talent give it a try and reach the top.
Same as women in motorsport, it´s almost a coincidence if some with real talent is interested in motorsport, so they´re a minority, but that does not mean they can´t reach the top, only that since they´re usually not as interested, few give it a try and most talented women never even try it
Anycase it was just a comment, no need to start a debate