Hoffman900 wrote: ↑11 Feb 2022, 17:16
godlameroso wrote: ↑11 Feb 2022, 17:14
Hoffman900 wrote: ↑11 Feb 2022, 17:04
I’m well aware of their origin and what they are used for, just why do you think that will work right where you think it will.
Because that's the low pressure side of the wing, accelerating air lowers it's pressure, lowering the pressure in the low pressure side means more wing performance. I can't make it any simpler than that.
Your theory hinges on the wing is in isolation and it's likely not. I think you're just making things up.
It's not a theory it's simple physics. It's obvious the rear wing will suffer detachment issues, especially at low speed. I've seen designs like that on R/C craft. Similar Re#'s similar results.
There's no bodywork in front of that section of the wing, so nothing upstream can affect it. Maybe having a rear wing less prone to stalling will ruin the downforce from bodywork behind the rear wing?