Ah, never mind then pal, crossed wires.Zynerji wrote: ↑23 Feb 2022, 15:35I was talking about the brake duct exit that aims at the underside of the rear wing.
Maybe I quoted the wrong post?
Ah, never mind then pal, crossed wires.Zynerji wrote: ↑23 Feb 2022, 15:35I was talking about the brake duct exit that aims at the underside of the rear wing.
Maybe I quoted the wrong post?
They're not playing games, to them it's just easy money. They now don't have to spend a penny on development as the designs are set. Just build and supply to RB & AT, they're not going to be learning anything new which was the reason they came back into the sport.Bill wrote: ↑23 Feb 2022, 15:15cars with indercut on sidepod are nothing new it has been done before by one of tbe small teams i just forgot which one.what interesting is the Honda logo is still on the car .Rbr wont be buiding pu like the story they sold us .Honda is playing games the got f1 to abandon token system know they got themto abandon devepment just when their pu is top notch.
I was thinking exactly the same; there is something slightly off about them….
Please do! But I have a feeling that you might want to be running it again after Bahrain testing!!
Like the Ferrari they have a lot of space to play around with, because the cooling is so compact. They could probably pull in the sidepods by 75mm if they wanted to. The pontoon around 'ORACLE' is pretty much empty space.
.
If they prevent it in Bahrain, then what? They'll have to revert to Barcelona spec?
So looking at these, perhaps the undercut isn't as extreme as they seem. I think the lower inlet lip makes the undercut of the sidepod itself look way bigger.
I'm wondering the same, if something is illegal or in a grey area, the FIA will absolutely step in. Really the purpose will be to just hide it from other teams.godlameroso wrote: ↑23 Feb 2022, 16:22If they prevent it in Bahrain, then what? They'll have to revert to Barcelona spec?
well, I have made an effort to keep the forum up to date and provided with images that encourage and support discussion technically. I try to learn more technical things from the commentary they may provoke.Wouter wrote: ↑23 Feb 2022, 16:35.AeroDynamic wrote: ↑23 Feb 2022, 15:52https://imgr1.auto-motor-und-sport.de/M ... 875619.jpg
https://imgr1.auto-motor-und-sport.de/M ... 875440.jpg
https://imgr1.auto-motor-und-sport.de/M ... 875674.jpg
https://imgr1.auto-motor-und-sport.de/M ... 875438.jpg
https://imgr1.auto-motor-und-sport.de/C ... 875569.jpg
You've gotten 110 upvotes in the last few weeks for posting photos of the new 2022 cars without further explanation.
I thought the new rating system was meant to indicate if someone has a lot of technical knowledge on this Technical Forum.
I'm definitely not saying you don't have technical insight, but posting pictures has nothing to do with technical knowledge.
These upvotes mean "Thank you for the photos" right?
I don't think this is fair to other members who post valuable information in threads where you can't vote.