Red Bull RB18

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
morefirejules08
morefirejules08
4
Joined: 11 Feb 2012, 14:21

Re: Red Bull RB18

Post

lio007 wrote:
26 Feb 2022, 18:22
All teams bar one have problems with the minimum weight. Rumour has it the RB18 is the most affected.
Marko told that yesterday has been a meeting to discuss another increase of minimum weight, although he doesn't expect a consensus to be found. He also said that Red Bull is going to bring a weight-upgrade (i.e. downgrade :) ) in Bahrain.
https://www.motorsport-magazin.com/form ... -anhebung/
Question is, which team isn’t overweight?

User avatar
gandharva
252
Joined: 06 Feb 2012, 15:19
Location: Munich

Re: Red Bull RB18

Post

morefirejules08 wrote:
27 Feb 2022, 16:07
Question is, which team isn’t overweight?
Alfa Romeo

User avatar
organic
1055
Joined: 08 Jan 2022, 02:24
Location: Cambridge, UK

Re: Red Bull RB18

Post

gandharva wrote:
27 Feb 2022, 16:08
morefirejules08 wrote:
27 Feb 2022, 16:07
Question is, which team isn’t overweight?
Alfa Romeo
They're also the team that's reportedly under the wheelbase limit by 9cm which is almost certainly why they're able to make it down to the limit:

https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/for ... sign-2022/

"What you don't see at first glance is the length of the car. According to information from auto motor und sport, the Alfa Romeo C42 is by far the shortest car in the field. The wheelbase, which was limited by the regulations to 3.6 metres for the first time this year, is said to have been cut by the Sauber engineers by another 9 centimetres.
The trick helps the aerodynamics and saves weight. The Alfa is said to be one of the few cars in the field that made it exactly to the limit of the maximum weight of 795 kilograms. During testing, some of the competitors were still lugging around excess weight in the double-digit kilogram range."

User avatar
DiogoBrand
73
Joined: 14 May 2015, 19:02
Location: Brazil

Re: Red Bull RB18

Post

Chuckjr wrote:
26 Feb 2022, 20:12
Tim, do you think Newey did this radical geometry more for aero purposes or mechanical purposes?
In Kyle's video about the RB18 he says it's most likely mechanical as he cannot see any aero benefit from it.

OO7
OO7
171
Joined: 06 Apr 2010, 17:49

Re: Red Bull RB18

Post

organic wrote:
27 Feb 2022, 16:22
gandharva wrote:
27 Feb 2022, 16:08
morefirejules08 wrote:
27 Feb 2022, 16:07
Question is, which team isn’t overweight?
Alfa Romeo
They're also the team that's reportedly under the wheelbase limit by 9cm which is almost certainly why they're able to make it down to the limit:

https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/for ... sign-2022/

"What you don't see at first glance is the length of the car. According to information from auto motor und sport, the Alfa Romeo C42 is by far the shortest car in the field. The wheelbase, which was limited by the regulations to 3.6 metres for the first time this year, is said to have been cut by the Sauber engineers by another 9 centimetres.
The trick helps the aerodynamics and saves weight. The Alfa is said to be one of the few cars in the field that made it exactly to the limit of the maximum weight of 795 kilograms. During testing, some of the competitors were still lugging around excess weight in the double-digit kilogram range."
I have my doubts over that article. A difference of 9cm isn't going to make a difference in the double digit kg range. Even 5kg would be excessive considering we're discussing carbon fibre structures.

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
365
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Red Bull RB18

Post

OO7 wrote:
27 Feb 2022, 18:46
organic wrote:
27 Feb 2022, 16:22
gandharva wrote:
27 Feb 2022, 16:08

Alfa Romeo
They're also the team that's reportedly under the wheelbase limit by 9cm which is almost certainly why they're able to make it down to the limit:

https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/for ... sign-2022/

"What you don't see at first glance is the length of the car. According to information from auto motor und sport, the Alfa Romeo C42 is by far the shortest car in the field. The wheelbase, which was limited by the regulations to 3.6 metres for the first time this year, is said to have been cut by the Sauber engineers by another 9 centimetres.
The trick helps the aerodynamics and saves weight. The Alfa is said to be one of the few cars in the field that made it exactly to the limit of the maximum weight of 795 kilograms. During testing, some of the competitors were still lugging around excess weight in the double-digit kilogram range."
I have my doubts over that article. A difference of 9cm isn't going to make a difference in the double digit kg range. Even 5kg would be excessive considering we're discussing carbon fibre structures.
I concur. 9cm isn't anything at all. I think the authors are a bit asleep. From the pre-season photos, the Alpine appears to be a shorter car than the others.
A lion must kill its prey.

cooken
cooken
11
Joined: 02 Apr 2013, 01:57

Re: Red Bull RB18

Post

OO7 wrote:
27 Feb 2022, 18:46
organic wrote:
27 Feb 2022, 16:22
gandharva wrote:
27 Feb 2022, 16:08

Alfa Romeo
They're also the team that's reportedly under the wheelbase limit by 9cm which is almost certainly why they're able to make it down to the limit:

https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/for ... sign-2022/

"What you don't see at first glance is the length of the car. According to information from auto motor und sport, the Alfa Romeo C42 is by far the shortest car in the field. The wheelbase, which was limited by the regulations to 3.6 metres for the first time this year, is said to have been cut by the Sauber engineers by another 9 centimetres.
The trick helps the aerodynamics and saves weight. The Alfa is said to be one of the few cars in the field that made it exactly to the limit of the maximum weight of 795 kilograms. During testing, some of the competitors were still lugging around excess weight in the double-digit kilogram range."
I have my doubts over that article. A difference of 9cm isn't going to make a difference in the double digit kg range. Even 5kg would be excessive considering we're discussing carbon fibre structures.
Assume:
- Simple increase in floor volume, with floor approximated as a rectangular plate.
- width = 1.6m (approx from regs)
- length = 0.09m
- density = 1550kg/m3 (quick Google search)
- mass = 5kg

Thickness of plate needed to achieve a 5kg mass increase from 9cm length increase:
t = m/(w*l*p) = 0.0224m or 2.24cm

No idea how thick an F1 floor is, but given the extra body work etc that might be associated...might not be that far fetched?

OO7
OO7
171
Joined: 06 Apr 2010, 17:49

Re: Red Bull RB18

Post

cooken wrote:
27 Feb 2022, 23:16
OO7 wrote:
27 Feb 2022, 18:46
organic wrote:
27 Feb 2022, 16:22


They're also the team that's reportedly under the wheelbase limit by 9cm which is almost certainly why they're able to make it down to the limit:

https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/for ... sign-2022/

"What you don't see at first glance is the length of the car. According to information from auto motor und sport, the Alfa Romeo C42 is by far the shortest car in the field. The wheelbase, which was limited by the regulations to 3.6 metres for the first time this year, is said to have been cut by the Sauber engineers by another 9 centimetres.
The trick helps the aerodynamics and saves weight. The Alfa is said to be one of the few cars in the field that made it exactly to the limit of the maximum weight of 795 kilograms. During testing, some of the competitors were still lugging around excess weight in the double-digit kilogram range."
I have my doubts over that article. A difference of 9cm isn't going to make a difference in the double digit kg range. Even 5kg would be excessive considering we're discussing carbon fibre structures.
Assume:
- Simple increase in floor volume, with floor approximated as a rectangular plate.
- width = 1.6m (approx from regs)
- length = 0.09m
- density = 1550kg/m3 (quick Google search)
- mass = 5kg

Thickness of plate needed to achieve a 5kg mass increase from 9cm length increase:
t = m/(w*l*p) = 0.0224m or 2.24cm

No idea how thick an F1 floor is, but given the extra body work etc that might be associated...might not be that far fetched?
These cars have wheelbases of around 3.5 metres, but if we apply that calculation over a 3 metre length of floor (which should be reasonable when including the diffuser), we get a floor weight of 166.66kg! That can't be right.

cooken
cooken
11
Joined: 02 Apr 2013, 01:57

Re: Red Bull RB18

Post

OO7 wrote:
27 Feb 2022, 23:37
cooken wrote:
27 Feb 2022, 23:16
OO7 wrote:
27 Feb 2022, 18:46

I have my doubts over that article. A difference of 9cm isn't going to make a difference in the double digit kg range. Even 5kg would be excessive considering we're discussing carbon fibre structures.
Assume:
- Simple increase in floor volume, with floor approximated as a rectangular plate.
- width = 1.6m (approx from regs)
- length = 0.09m
- density = 1550kg/m3 (quick Google search)
- mass = 5kg

Thickness of plate needed to achieve a 5kg mass increase from 9cm length increase:
t = m/(w*l*p) = 0.0224m or 2.24cm

No idea how thick an F1 floor is, but given the extra body work etc that might be associated...might not be that far fetched?
These cars have wheelbases of around 3.5 metres, but if we apply that calculation over a 3 metre length of floor (which should be reasonable when including the diffuser), we get a floor weight of 166.66kg! That can't be right.
Sorry I didn't mean to suggest 2.24cm would be an actual floor thickness, again I have no idea what it would actually be (on average or locally). Just some back of napkin order of magnitude stuff.

Consider that increasing wheelbase will mean increasing the length of a bunch of stuff connecting front to rear, depending on where the extra length happens. 9cm on the skid block would be ~0.4kg.

OO7
OO7
171
Joined: 06 Apr 2010, 17:49

Re: Red Bull RB18

Post

By skid block you mean the titanium/magnesium skids and not the plank right?

cooken
cooken
11
Joined: 02 Apr 2013, 01:57

Re: Red Bull RB18

Post

OO7 wrote:
28 Feb 2022, 01:00
By skid block you mean the titanium/magnesium skids and not the plank right?
Sorry yes I meant the plank. I didn't dig deep in the regs, used a 300mm width and 10mm thickness with 1.3 SG.

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
559
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: Red Bull RB18

Post

You can have the same size chassis and sweep the front suspension rearward and the rear suspenion forward and easily get that shortened 9cm of wheelbase.
🖐️✌️☝️👀👌✍️🐎🏆🙏

Racing Green in 2028

Lefty8
Lefty8
2
Joined: 24 Jan 2019, 14:11

Re: Red Bull RB18

Post

cooken wrote:
27 Feb 2022, 23:16
OO7 wrote:
27 Feb 2022, 18:46
organic wrote:
27 Feb 2022, 16:22


They're also the team that's reportedly under the wheelbase limit by 9cm which is almost certainly why they're able to make it down to the limit:

https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/for ... sign-2022/

"What you don't see at first glance is the length of the car. According to information from auto motor und sport, the Alfa Romeo C42 is by far the shortest car in the field. The wheelbase, which was limited by the regulations to 3.6 metres for the first time this year, is said to have been cut by the Sauber engineers by another 9 centimetres.
The trick helps the aerodynamics and saves weight. The Alfa is said to be one of the few cars in the field that made it exactly to the limit of the maximum weight of 795 kilograms. During testing, some of the competitors were still lugging around excess weight in the double-digit kilogram range."
I have my doubts over that article. A difference of 9cm isn't going to make a difference in the double digit kg range. Even 5kg would be excessive considering we're discussing carbon fibre structures.
Assume:
- Simple increase in floor volume, with floor approximated as a rectangular plate.
- width = 1.6m (approx from regs)
- length = 0.09m
- density = 1550kg/m3 (quick Google search)
- mass = 5kg

Thickness of plate needed to achieve a 5kg mass increase from 9cm length increase:
t = m/(w*l*p) = 0.0224m or 2.24cm

No idea how thick an F1 floor is, but given the extra body work etc that might be associated...might not be that far fetched?
The tub will be the thickest structure comprising Unidirectional carbon fibre, kevlar, aluminium honeycomb and polyurethane foam. If the tub is shorter to achieve the shorter wheelbase then it plausible that 9cm saved translates into a weight saving

User avatar
Vanja #66
1562
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 16:38

Re: Red Bull RB18

Post

PlatinumZealot wrote:
28 Feb 2022, 01:32
You can have the same size chassis and sweep the front suspension rearward and the rear suspenion forward and easily get that shortened 9cm of wheelbase.
I'm not sure that's the case. Chassis length depends on total length, and total length is a function of wheelbase + front and rear wing box lengths, since wing boxes are referenced. From the technical rules article:

Article 3 will no longer describe the dimensions of the regulation volumes, instead teams will input their wheelbase, front bulkhead and differential locations into the FIA CAD portal, with the volumes autogenerating for download.
And they call it a stall. A STALL!

#DwarvesAreNaturalSprinters
#BlessYouLaddie

User avatar
Godius
186
Joined: 02 Mar 2013, 12:49
Location: NL

Re: Red Bull RB18

Post

Notice the outwash wake behind the front tires:

Image

(brake disc heat dissipation?)