I really don't know. There isn't anything that says 2 layers of carbon fibre need to be 100% adhered to each other over their entire surface.JordanMugen wrote: ↑02 Mar 2022, 16:11Wouldn't that be blatant cheating?KeiKo403 wrote: ↑01 Mar 2022, 23:45I’m not suggesting a double skinned floor with a void in between, more of a carbon sandwich where the lower half would deform to create a void, I know there would need to be a way to allow air in and out of the void. As for the X/Y cross sections, if a floor was theoretically cross sectioned couldn’t the team just claim it has been cut, structural integrity blah blah blah that why there’s now a gap?
I don’t have answers and it might be a terrible idea, but could it be done and would it be advantageous?
I guess it's like the holes in the floor edges from a few seasons ago, where it wasn't a hole because it was a slot.
I'm sure F1 engineers (or their lawyers) can find a way to make it legal, is it beneficial though?
----------------------------
After thought...
...it would surely be designed with the intent to deform and therefore fall under the movable aero rules making it illegal.