McLaren MCL36

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
101FlyingDutchman
101FlyingDutchman
17
Joined: 27 Feb 2019, 12:01

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

Those rads still look really big in comparison some of the others. Is that because it’s a standard rad?

User avatar
djos
113
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

101FlyingDutchman wrote:
19 Mar 2022, 10:06
Those rads still look really big in comparison some of the others. Is that because it’s a standard rad?
They look bigger because Mclaren use air to air intercoolers instead of water to air.
"In downforce we trust"

101FlyingDutchman
101FlyingDutchman
17
Joined: 27 Feb 2019, 12:01

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

djos wrote:
19 Mar 2022, 10:39
101FlyingDutchman wrote:
19 Mar 2022, 10:06
Those rads still look really big in comparison some of the others. Is that because it’s a standard rad?
They look bigger because Mclaren use air to air intercoolers instead of water to air.
Must be a reason for it. Guess it’s lighter but just more bulky?

User avatar
djos
113
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

101FlyingDutchman wrote:
19 Mar 2022, 11:15
djos wrote:
19 Mar 2022, 10:39
101FlyingDutchman wrote:
19 Mar 2022, 10:06
Those rads still look really big in comparison some of the others. Is that because it’s a standard rad?
They look bigger because Mclaren use air to air intercoolers instead of water to air.
Must be a reason for it. Guess it’s lighter but just more bulky?
That would be my guess too.
"In downforce we trust"

User avatar
Big Tea
99
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 20:57

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

101FlyingDutchman wrote:
19 Mar 2022, 11:15
djos wrote:
19 Mar 2022, 10:39
101FlyingDutchman wrote:
19 Mar 2022, 10:06
Those rads still look really big in comparison some of the others. Is that because it’s a standard rad?
They look bigger because Mclaren use air to air intercoolers instead of water to air.
Must be a reason for it. Guess it’s lighter but just more bulky?
Would it work out lighter? There is not the weight of fluid, but the extra material used for 'size' must add to it, also the extra room needed has to be covered etc?
When arguing with a fool, be sure the other person is not doing the same thing.

PhillipM
PhillipM
386
Joined: 16 May 2011, 15:18
Location: Over the road from Boothy...

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

Big Tea wrote:
19 Mar 2022, 13:14

Would it work out lighter? There is not the weight of fluid, but the extra material used for 'size' must add to it, also the extra room needed has to be covered etc?
Easily offset by not needing another intercooler/rad for the cooling fluid.

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
365
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

PhillipM wrote:
19 Mar 2022, 14:03
Big Tea wrote:
19 Mar 2022, 13:14

Would it work out lighter? There is not the weight of fluid, but the extra material used for 'size' must add to it, also the extra room needed has to be covered etc?
Easily offset by not needing another intercooler/rad for the cooling fluid.
True, but I think overall a shorter intake tract might be worth some engine performance and responsiveness which may offset the weight increase.
A lion must kill its prey.

User avatar
hugobos
0
Joined: 30 Dec 2009, 11:01

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

You also do not need a header tank -limited by a mandatory relief valve. And there is no power take off the engine for a pump . I did not know this air to air was used by Mclaren thanks for sharing that.
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced

User avatar
vorticism
323
Joined: 01 Mar 2022, 20:20

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

Highlight of the unique engine cover shape:

Image
𓄀

User avatar
mwillems
44
Joined: 04 Sep 2016, 22:11

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

Would it be against the rules to put hot air into the floor to increase the low pressure underneath the car?
I'm not taking advice from a cartoon dog

-Bandit

User avatar
Vasco
0
Joined: 21 Apr 2004, 22:05
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

Quick question, onboard with Ricciardo, the car looked to be really struggling with understeer. Is this the result of the compromised brake setup, where the fronts are not at the right operating temperatures - was the original front brake design aimed at generating heat into the front tyres and keeping them in the right window.

Another area of concern is the decision to use a front pull rod - the concerns previously were that it resulted in more understeer than push rod and is this also a result of that design choice.

Emag
Emag
84
Joined: 11 Feb 2019, 14:56

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

Vasco wrote:
20 Mar 2022, 12:44
Quick question, onboard with Ricciardo, the car looked to be really struggling with understeer. Is this the result of the compromised brake setup, where the fronts are not at the right operating temperatures - was the original front brake design aimed at generating heat into the front tyres and keeping them in the right window.

Another area of concern is the decision to use a front pull rod - the concerns previously were that it resulted in more understeer than push rod and is this also a result of that design choice.
RedBull has pull rod on the front and push rod on the back, so that's not the issue. How much the braking issue has affected them, I cannot say, but understeer was particularly bad on this circuit even on Lando's car.

User avatar
KingHamilton01
3
Joined: 08 Jun 2012, 17:12

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

Just curious to know how difficult would it be for McLaren to change concept at this point in the season? for example if they wanted to go for an undercut in the sidepods, could that be something they could realistically change or to many fundamental components that would need to be move like radiator layout etc. Think there is at least some scope for changing the way sidepods would aid airflow to the rear of the car if that isn't working as intended and not creating the high pressure airflow they want at the moment.

For the record I do believe they are somewhat compromised by there brake setup atm, so they have some time in hand there for sure. But as the team said that could be the 3rd-4th race in before they get on top of those issue's clearly not easy manufacturing the part's they need for the brakes or they have decided to adopt a new philosophy from another team there.
McLaren Mercedes

f1rules
f1rules
597
Joined: 11 Jan 2004, 15:34
Location: Denmark

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

not that easy in my opinion, they used the wide sidepod layout, the space they gained, to package all their electronics, so everything needs to be re-packaged

User avatar
Zynerji
110
Joined: 27 Jan 2016, 16:14

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

mwillems wrote:
20 Mar 2022, 11:32
Would it be against the rules to put hot air into the floor to increase the low pressure underneath the car?
It could not enter by a hole. I believe the floor most be solid, and only fed air on the edges.