2022 Oracle | Red Bull Racing F1 Team

This forum contains threads to discuss teams themselves. Anything not technical about the cars, including restructuring, performances etc belongs here.
AR3-GP
AR3-GP
365
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: 2022 Oracle | Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Race had safety car laps. Running out of fuel is unlikely.
A lion must kill its prey.

User avatar
Jambier
5
Joined: 07 Mar 2018, 11:02
Location: France

Re: 2022 Oracle | Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

On the positive side: This car is very fast.

I am sure that Verstappen will be able to fight for his second title, against Ferrari and against the return of Mercedes.

I was worried with 2021 battle and resources focus on 2021, also worried of Honda departure, but in terms of speed, none of that affected the car, great job from the team!

User avatar
Juzh
161
Joined: 06 Oct 2012, 08:45

Re: 2022 Oracle | Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

So I went trough verstappen's onboard and team radio. One thing they need to sort out is brakes. Verstappen was told to lift and coast after 6 corners I kid you not. And after than probably 3 times per lap, every lap. At one point Verstappen says he's barely braking at all with so much lift off and it's impossible to race like that.
Brake problems seem to subsided once car was lighter, leclerc drove off and verstappen settled into his own rhythm, not trying to attack anymore. Yeah, can't really race like that a whole lot.

About the undercuts. Verstappen really could be ahead of leclerc, or at least side by side into T1, had they decided to push after pitting. This would put Verstappen on ideal racing line into T1 and leclerc on the compromised inside, the opposite of what we got. Verstappen was basically cruising on the outlap, doing lift and coast and just generally not being on the limit, at one point even being told gap was too big for an undercut. This turned out to be completely false. Ok, first time it could be argued they weren't anticipating it (3.9s deficit - a lot for undercut to work), but second time it was just silly, why not at least try it? Gap before pitting was almost the same as the first time at 4s and it's not like they had much to lose. Daft decision by RB. Completely understandable Max was livid.

PhillipM
PhillipM
386
Joined: 16 May 2011, 15:18
Location: Over the road from Boothy...

Re: 2022 Oracle | Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Wasn't that daft, everyone that pushed their tyres hard on the outlap suffered a lot with deg later on, the tyres are too cold with these bigger carcasses and lower blanket temps. The team ain't stupid.

User avatar
Juzh
161
Joined: 06 Oct 2012, 08:45

Re: 2022 Oracle | Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

I don't agree. One push lap wouldn't make a difference in the end with Sainz being so far back. Either you try and go for first place, or you're second in any case. As it turned out they didn't even try it. Very un-redbull like.

User avatar
TNTHead
9
Joined: 01 May 2017, 21:41
Location: The Netherlands

Re: 2022 Oracle | Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Juzh wrote:
21 Mar 2022, 13:26
So I went trough verstappen's onboard and team radio. One thing they need to sort out is brakes. Verstappen was told to lift and coast after 6 corners I kid you not. And after than probably 3 times per lap, every lap. At one point Verstappen says he's barely braking at all with so much lift off and it's impossible to race like that.
Brake problems seem to subsided once car was lighter, leclerc drove off and verstappen settled into his own rhythm, not trying to attack anymore. Yeah, can't really race like that a whole lot.

About the undercuts. Verstappen really could be ahead of leclerc, or at least side by side into T1, had they decided to push after pitting. This would put Verstappen on ideal racing line into T1 and leclerc on the compromised inside, the opposite of what we got. Verstappen was basically cruising on the outlap, doing lift and coast and just generally not being on the limit, at one point even being told gap was too big for an undercut. This turned out to be completely false. Ok, first time it could be argued they weren't anticipating it (3.9s deficit - a lot for undercut to work), but second time it was just silly, why not at least try it? Gap before pitting was almost the same as the first time at 4s and it's not like they had much to lose. Daft decision by RB. Completely understandable Max was livid.
Okay, a more understandable reaction by VER.
Apart from the fuel pump issues they apparently also have serious brake cooling issues. Lot's of homework to do then. Not very surprising since the new regs and dialing in all necessary cooling requirements.At Jeddah the temperature is probably higher than in Bahrain, so I hope they can do something the coming days.

User avatar
Big Tea
99
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 20:57

Re: 2022 Oracle | Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

If there was proposing I could suggest that there may have been periods where the pump intake was not surrounded by fuel and drawing air. However, ~RBR does not seem to be one of the cars suffering from proposing, and I assume the baffling would be the same as on previous cars, so my suggestion, other than some component only in the Red Bull fuel, vibration or temperature
When arguing with a fool, be sure the other person is not doing the same thing.

Just_a_fan
Just_a_fan
593
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: 2022 Oracle | Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Juzh wrote:
21 Mar 2022, 13:40
I don't agree. One push lap wouldn't make a difference in the end with Sainz being so far back. Either you try and go for first place, or you're second in any case. As it turned out they didn't even try it. Very un-redbull like.
Could it be that they were genuinely very worried about the car finishing if he pushed? Pushing hard for a couple of laps might have killed the brakes. Better to be close and attempt to put pressure on Leclerc than have a glorious lap in the lead before DNFing with brake failure.

No idea if this might have been the case, but if the team were telling him to be careful for so much of the race, they must have been very concerned about the issue.
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

PhillipM
PhillipM
386
Joined: 16 May 2011, 15:18
Location: Over the road from Boothy...

Re: 2022 Oracle | Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Juzh wrote:
21 Mar 2022, 13:40
I don't agree. One push lap wouldn't make a difference in the end with Sainz being so far back. Either you try and go for first place, or you're second in any case. As it turned out they didn't even try it. Very un-redbull like.
It makes a difference if you scrape a load of rubber off the top of the tyre through orange peeling because they're too cold for the load you're demanding of them. Hamilton had that problem after trying to keep a place on the outlap and ended up pitting for new tyres early.

User avatar
gastonmazzacane
2
Joined: 20 Jan 2015, 15:07
Location: Slovenia

Re: 2022 Oracle | Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Next race is in a week time. Is this even fixable? (relocating the pump?)

Bill_Kar
Bill_Kar
1
Joined: 02 Apr 2017, 09:38

Re: 2022 Oracle | Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

I'm baffled by RB management. Horner said yesterday that it was the right choice for Max to not push too much on the outlap and now Marko says it was a mistake?

User avatar
Juzh
161
Joined: 06 Oct 2012, 08:45

Re: 2022 Oracle | Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

PhillipM wrote:
21 Mar 2022, 13:55
Juzh wrote:
21 Mar 2022, 13:40
I don't agree. One push lap wouldn't make a difference in the end with Sainz being so far back. Either you try and go for first place, or you're second in any case. As it turned out they didn't even try it. Very un-redbull like.
It makes a difference if you scrape a load of rubber off the top of the tyre through orange peeling because they're too cold for the load you're demanding of them. Hamilton had that problem after trying to keep a place on the outlap and ended up pitting for new tyres early.
But that was on the hard, a horrible tyre, and mercedes was struggling more anyway. I still think it was worth a shot, I'm not a fan of just consolidating positions and be done with it, who knows what can happen later on? You don't need to look far, just back to Jeddah last year. Red bull gambled and didn't pit under SC and profited from a red flag not long after. If you don't try you can't succeed.

User avatar
Juzh
161
Joined: 06 Oct 2012, 08:45

Re: 2022 Oracle | Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Just_a_fan wrote:
21 Mar 2022, 13:54
Juzh wrote:
21 Mar 2022, 13:40
I don't agree. One push lap wouldn't make a difference in the end with Sainz being so far back. Either you try and go for first place, or you're second in any case. As it turned out they didn't even try it. Very un-redbull like.
Could it be that they were genuinely very worried about the car finishing if he pushed? Pushing hard for a couple of laps might have killed the brakes. Better to be close and attempt to put pressure on Leclerc than have a glorious lap in the lead before DNFing with brake failure.

No idea if this might have been the case, but if the team were telling him to be careful for so much of the race, they must have been very concerned about the issue.
Could be, but when push came to shove Verstappen was able to attack leclerc for 3 laps in a row while being in hot, dirty air, so I think they had enough margin for a one solid outlap in clean air. On top of that they didn't use any high powered modes for outlap, just normal cruise as far as I can tell. He was told to use overtake down to T4 to defend just after the overtake so they must have had some power in reserve at that stage.

Just_a_fan
Just_a_fan
593
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: 2022 Oracle | Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Juzh wrote:
21 Mar 2022, 14:34
Just_a_fan wrote:
21 Mar 2022, 13:54
Juzh wrote:
21 Mar 2022, 13:40
I don't agree. One push lap wouldn't make a difference in the end with Sainz being so far back. Either you try and go for first place, or you're second in any case. As it turned out they didn't even try it. Very un-redbull like.
Could it be that they were genuinely very worried about the car finishing if he pushed? Pushing hard for a couple of laps might have killed the brakes. Better to be close and attempt to put pressure on Leclerc than have a glorious lap in the lead before DNFing with brake failure.

No idea if this might have been the case, but if the team were telling him to be careful for so much of the race, they must have been very concerned about the issue.
Could be, but when push came to shove Verstappen was able to attack leclerc for 3 laps in a row while being in hot, dirty air, so I think they had enough margin for a one solid outlap in clean air. On top of that they didn't use any high powered modes for outlap, just normal cruise as far as I can tell. He was told to use overtake down to T4 to defend just after the overtake so they must have had some power in reserve at that stage.
It was all a bit strange, whatever the reasoning behind it.
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

silver
silver
5
Joined: 23 Feb 2021, 06:50

Re: 2022 Oracle | Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Juzh wrote:
21 Mar 2022, 13:26
So I went trough verstappen's onboard and team radio. One thing they need to sort out is brakes. Verstappen was told to lift and coast after 6 corners I kid you not. And after than probably 3 times per lap, every lap. At one point Verstappen says he's barely braking at all with so much lift off and it's impossible to race like that.
Brake problems seem to subsided once car was lighter, leclerc drove off and verstappen settled into his own rhythm, not trying to attack anymore. Yeah, can't really race like that a whole lot.
What is strange is that preseason is meant to find out these problems. But they didn't and at first opportunity in real time, the components fail to meet the expectations. What is the point of collecting millions of miles of data if they don't push the components to find the reliability. There have been instances in the past in testing, where teams used to drive until the car runs out of fuel which was a good way to iron out these exact sort of issues.