looks like engine wise Heikki is in the best position from now on and Kubica the worst. Is his 2nd engine totally blown & unusable?
The BGP's & the RBR's are in the same position pretty much.
Or get a DNF. I don't think anyone will be keeping the old one if it can be changed with no penalty incurred.ISLAMATRON wrote:And with the gearboxes, just assume its the same one for 4 straight races unless they get a 5 grid spot penalty for a box change.
A loophole that i can see being closed on cost cutting grounds.Paul wrote:Nope, the teams only have to prove to FIA they haven't retired the car deliberately.
I ordered the drivers by driver number. You know, impartiality toward drivers is a must for the people handling the site, even if everybody knows JPM was the best and most entertaining driver to watch in history, no matter what the fans of that german guy (whose name I've forgotten) say.roost89 wrote:Some nice data!
Would it be possible to change the layout so that the engines are together? So McLaren are followed by Brawn and Force India. Renault followed by Red Bull etc. So as comparisons between how each team uses the engines is easier to see.
Thanks for putting so much time into thisVery much appreciated!
that would probably be best, have 3 or 4 test engines, and then have id recon 4 race engines, as then it would mean that engines would have to last miles longer.ISLAMATRON wrote:I think they need to adjust the rules as per the total number of engines per season.
Currently(17 races) I think they should adjust it to allow 4 engines for fridays and 5 for sat/sundays.
That way the teams can test/run more on Fridays without fearing of putting too much miles on the engine.
and they should switch it from just engines to the entire drivetrain(engine/transaxle/KERS).
As it stands now running too much on Friday can be a detriment to your entire racing season.