50,00km engine life, pneumatic valves, MGUH = sort of technology transfer...early days
johnny comelately wrote: ↑01 Jun 2022, 02:47Once you trim away some of the superfluous stuff there is some interesting history here.
Eg, fuel blends including going back to the 10% toluene; the German wartime fuel production and its affect; original straight blade turbo impellers
Wasnt the Honda fuel of the turbo era 1 majorly toluene?? and had to be heated to increase the reid vapour??Tommy Cookers wrote: ↑04 Jun 2022, 12:19TOLUENE STORY II
this paper https://www.enginehistory.org/Reference ... istics.pdf says ... benzene = benzol ...
and more usefully is revealing in other ways ie ....
we assume rich mixture improves detonation resistance aka Octane Number ON or Performance Number PN but ....
many of the typical petrol/gasoline ingredients chemically classified as paraffins ....
eg our friendly reference fuel (iso)octane have nil response to richening - but respond strongly to tetra-ethyl lead TEL
(remember charge air temperature is fixed in ON and PN tests)
WW2 wannabe typical petrol/gasoline ingredient the fancy manmade paraffin ....
'Triptane' (2,2,3-trimethyl butane) responded well to both richening and TEL - hence its prominence as '300 Octane'
(actually 300 PN ie a '100 PN' engine's power could notionally be trebled by raising the boost)
many of the typical petrol/gasoline ingredients chemically classified as aromatics .....
eg benzene & accomplices toluene and most xylenes have nil response to TEL - but respond strongly to richening
don't tell the FIA !!!!
the FIA demanded eg turbo F1 fuel etc didn't exceed 101 Research Octane Number RON ... but ....
RON (and MON) require using the worst mixture strength eg lean
because toluene etc gives rather low ON when lean - but rather high when rich
the 101 RON 84/16 toluene/heptane blend (because raced slightly rich) behaved much better than the FIA intended
was toluene the 'rocket fuel' of F1 legend or myth ??
it's c.20% denser than conventional fuel - so contains about 20% more energy per litre
(but c.0% more per kg - and (unlike alcohols) only c.0% more per amount burnable with the ICE's air massflow)
it was used in postwar cruise missiles (submarine or air-launched) to minimise bulk - these of course weren't rockets
the first FIA tankage reduction failed to limit power (because the FIA hadn't thought of these higher fuel densities)
severe tankage reductions were then needed - these were effective in reducing power
benzene and toluene etc were minor ingredients of some mogas
toluene and/or xylenes are still a minor ingredient of avgas - one maker now quotes its 100/130 avgas as 103/130
to this extent many WDCs were in part won on toluene
Astonishing!johnny comelately wrote: ↑15 Jun 2022, 13:59Astounding to this uneducated mind
And before anyone jumps up and down, yes it might be better suited to another section but it can be connected to fuel production from algae and solar energy at a stretch.