CFD simulations can crash. MFlow helps to setup rather stable simulations but things can happen, esp. if you have bad geometries for some reason. You should check the solver.log and make sure the simulation ran to the end. It can fail for reasons of numerical stability, or your computer screwed up (out of memory). It is a bit more unlikely but it can also run out of memory when creating the surfaces used in post-processing.
Yeah, usually a geometry issue when that happens to me. Sometimes I can fix it by just increasing the resolution of the STL output for the part in question.LVDH wrote: ↑29 Jul 2022, 09:32CFD simulations can crash. MFlow helps to setup rather stable simulations but things can happen, esp. if you have bad geometries for some reason. You should check the solver.log and make sure the simulation ran to the end. It can fail for reasons of numerical stability, or your computer screwed up (out of memory). It is a bit more unlikely but it can also run out of memory when creating the surfaces used in post-processing.
When you load a case which contains all files, do you see everything in MFlow? You might face an issue once mentioned here, that the files might not be in the same scale (some km long, others only mm?).yinlad wrote: ↑30 Jul 2022, 00:06Done a bit more testing and I'm very confused now. If I run the wheels and mandatory parts separately, I get all samples in post. Same for my cars files. But once I combine them and do a run, the post processing stuff that generates the VTKs crashes and fails.
Not expecting miracles but if anyone has any idea on things to try I'm all ears. I'm going to try a run with mflow 'd' version as a hail mary in case some config change in 'e' is interfering with openfoam some how but it's a wild stab in the dark
All mandatory parts will get inserted into the simulation, so if you would not model this part, but everything behind and in front of it, you might get a valid car. I would recommend creating some nice looking surfaces which are slightly offset of the safety cell though.RicME85 wrote: ↑30 Jul 2022, 03:14This might be seen as a daft question...but here goes.
MAND_Safetycell_MVRC_V07 - Is it expected to enclose it or can we create our own bodywork that attaches directly to it? I know it cannot be modified but say, adding surfaces that connect to it are fine yes? So for example I can create bodywork that shapes the cockpit surround better, I dont have to say offset the whole geometry by say 10mm to create the shapes I want?
I was hoping to enter the first race but it isnt looking likely, even with the delay.
Yeah everything is there. As I say I've run 2 separate cases (mandatory parts and my parts) that both generate the full VTK suite, but when combined break for some reason.LVDH wrote: ↑30 Jul 2022, 08:22When you load a case which contains all files, do you see everything in MFlow? You might face an issue once mentioned here, that the files might not be in the same scale (some km long, others only mm?).yinlad wrote: ↑30 Jul 2022, 00:06Done a bit more testing and I'm very confused now. If I run the wheels and mandatory parts separately, I get all samples in post. Same for my cars files. But once I combine them and do a run, the post processing stuff that generates the VTKs crashes and fails.
Not expecting miracles but if anyone has any idea on things to try I'm all ears. I'm going to try a run with mflow 'd' version as a hail mary in case some config change in 'e' is interfering with openfoam some how but it's a wild stab in the dark
Its's very wrong and you should be ashamed of yourselfTalnoRacing wrote: ↑30 Jul 2022, 10:46Finally got a car together and submitted an entry. Could not get CFD done, so I am hoping I didn't get it too wrong.
https://i.ibb.co/qgVDd9V/TR22.jpg
Looking sexy! And that's my favorite sidepod configuration.TalnoRacing wrote: ↑30 Jul 2022, 10:46Finally got a car together and submitted an entry. Could not get CFD done, so I am hoping I didn't get it too wrong.
https://i.ibb.co/qgVDd9V/TR22.jpg
Maybe you could require second order continuity and blended surfaces, with a minimums radius and not intersecting surfaces.LVDH wrote: ↑30 Jul 2022, 11:25Well, it is a very unique nose. I might have to create a rule about minimal surface in an X-cut for safety reasons.
And thanks to that new Aston Martin rear wing, I now understand that we should not have rear wing end plates above the main elements of the rear wing. No idea how to deal with that though.
You could have tried to integrate the air box a bit better...
It is very cool to start seeing the new cars. Lets hope for a very cool season, even if the start is more than rough.