quote]While I do get what you mean Kilcoo316, would it not be benificial for a rival team at all? I mean it wasn't long ago that F1 teams used to cover their rear wings so other teams couldn't see their setup (until it was banned of course)
Surely there'd be some benifit to a rival team, even if just to see "Oh so that's how they've done that then...maybe we should look into that?" [/quote]
Your logic is intuitive, but in my opinion there are too many variables for a team to benifit off of specific design details, let alone the broader aesthetic features of these devices.
Take the Brawn design for example. One could speculate that they have most successfully exploited this loophole, however none of the other teams' DDD solutions have mirrored the appearance of that on the Brawn. It would seem that there are just too many other dependancies to allow a given team's design to have carry over value to others (except maybe the RBR STR thing....). I would also think that rear end aero parts are even more subject to this as their optimization would be contigent upon all upstream influences.
Furthermore, this years testing ban would place even more emphasis on organic developement as teams don't have the time for a trial and error based approach.
.....Oh sh@t I just saw an update with their floors covered. So much for my theory..
“It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so" - Mark Twain