Rb statement
I don't buy anything of that and at the same time I'm not surprised you happily buy it.mendis wrote: ↑10 Oct 2022, 17:53I didn't know spending for catering/absenteesm can also provide performance to the car.LM10 wrote: ↑10 Oct 2022, 17:48So finally it's official now. After all, as always, it actually was true that where is smoke, there is fire.
Considering Alfa Romeo for example have 2.4 million dollars for in-season-development available, one can only think of the possibilities in terms of performance gain when you overshoot the budget cap by up to 2 millions.
Fred Vasseur:Otmar Szafnauer:You have to understand that sometimes with €200,000 you can bring a big update. And if you overshoot the budget by this, it's a couple of tenths for more than one race.At the margin, any spend above the margin is spent on performance: And once you start spending on performance where others don't get a chance to, because they've actually stuck to the budget cap, that's serious.
That was a fun statement. FIA doesn't mention where the over expenditure was and I trust what the FIA says. As much as we trusted them when they handled the matters when a team got away with burning oil to gain an advantage or another one burning excess fuel, circumventing fuel flow meter to gain an advantage. This is part of the sport where teams push to gain an advantage. So let's trust FIA one more time.LM10 wrote: ↑10 Oct 2022, 18:02I don't buy anything of that and at the same time I'm not surprised you happily buy it.mendis wrote: ↑10 Oct 2022, 17:53I didn't know spending for catering/absenteesm can also provide performance to the car.LM10 wrote: ↑10 Oct 2022, 17:48So finally it's official now. After all, as always, it actually was true that where is smoke, there is fire.
Considering Alfa Romeo for example have 2.4 million dollars for in-season-development available, one can only think of the possibilities in terms of performance gain when you overshoot the budget cap by up to 2 millions.
Fred Vasseur:
Otmar Szafnauer:
If you use up your whole budget and still need more money, it means that you spent your money less strictly in all other areas.
Tbh, I think they know and accept that they are over the cap. But in my opinion what has left RB with 'surprise and disappointment' was the fact that rival teams knew a lot about RB cost cap issues through leaks from the FIA, and is probably dragging their heels in to embarrass the FIA even more because of the recent events, and I can't blame them. Even if they have been found to breach the cost cap, the manner it has occurred in the media and through the rival teams is wrong and shouldn't have happened.MtthsMlw wrote: ↑10 Oct 2022, 18:00Rb statement
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FeuCoalX0AY ... ame=large
I can’t believe this RB statement at all. Wolff and Binotto have been vocal enough that they overspent, how can RB be so ‘surprised’?MtthsMlw wrote: ↑10 Oct 2022, 18:00Rb statement
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FeuCoalX0AY ... ame=large
Precisely.
For all you know, it might have been a couple of hundred pounds. As FIA doesn't mention it for now, we can either look at it as a couple of hundred dollars (from RB fan perspective) or a 4.99% of cost cap (from an RB adversary perspective). Both would be correct assumptions.Tvetovnato wrote: ↑10 Oct 2022, 18:05Will they disclose how much it was? Would be interesting to put it in relation to Mercedes’ claim that they had to refrain from bringing a new floor last year worth 300K which would have made their car quicker.
Because it was RB who submitted the documents to FIA, not Wolff and Binotto.KeiKo403 wrote: ↑10 Oct 2022, 18:09I can’t believe this RB statement at all. Wolff and Binotto have been vocal enough that they overspent, how can RB be so ‘surprised’?MtthsMlw wrote: ↑10 Oct 2022, 18:00Rb statement
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FeuCoalX0AY ... ame=large
I’m not interested in any fan perspective, I’m interested in facts, which I sure hope will come out for the all but lost credibility of this sport.mendis wrote: ↑10 Oct 2022, 18:10For all you know, it might have been a couple of hundred pounds. As FIA doesn't mention it for now, we can either look at it as a couple of hundred dollars (from RB fan perspective) or a 4.99% of cost cap (from an RB adversary perspective). Both would be correct assumptions.Tvetovnato wrote: ↑10 Oct 2022, 18:05Will they disclose how much it was? Would be interesting to put it in relation to Mercedes’ claim that they had to refrain from bringing a new floor last year worth 300K which would have made their car quicker.
Did we get one from 2019?Tvetovnato wrote: ↑10 Oct 2022, 18:16I’m not interested in any fan perspective, I’m interested in facts, which I sure hope will come out for the all but lost credibility of this sport.mendis wrote: ↑10 Oct 2022, 18:10For all you know, it might have been a couple of hundred pounds. As FIA doesn't mention it for now, we can either look at it as a couple of hundred dollars (from RB fan perspective) or a 4.99% of cost cap (from an RB adversary perspective). Both would be correct assumptions.Tvetovnato wrote: ↑10 Oct 2022, 18:05Will they disclose how much it was? Would be interesting to put it in relation to Mercedes’ claim that they had to refrain from bringing a new floor last year worth 300K which would have made their car quicker.
Completely to the contrary of what you say, the FIA is not even close to being trustworthy in what they say. The FIA saying that RedBull overshot the budget cap and gained a significant performance advantage in doing so, would be a really huge thing. It would put both titles of Max in doubt and at the same time it would mean that the FIA was unable to monitor such a sensitive thing. Do you really think the FIA wants that mess?mendis wrote: ↑10 Oct 2022, 18:08That was a fun statement. FIA doesn't mention where the over expenditure was and I trust what the FIA says. As much as we trusted them when they handled the matters when a team got away with burning oil to gain an advantage or another one burning excess fuel to gain an advantage. This is part of the sport where teams push to gain an advantage. So let's trust FIA one more time.