Windtunnel: Its offcourse to late to change now! But why on earth they didnt years agoo pursue a deal with merc or others, to fill out their tunnel time. If the current setup represent such a deficit they claim, a interim solution should have been found.
Engineers:
Honestly in my opinion mclaren behaved either very naive or arrogant, i dont know which is worse It should in my opinion always be a goal to get key personal from leading competitors when youre not the leading team yourself. Mclaren havent excelled in anything but marketing for years, and there where no signs of its tech team being top top level, so why not try and strength from the teams that sets the agenda.
Car development:
What i mean by that is chipping away on your weak areas. Mclaren had a weak front end for years and still have. Offcourse this is influenced by the dna of these cars also, even max initially had a weak frontend at RB but still. Mclaren then last year finally had a car matching on high speed low drag tracks like monza. Finally we had one tiny area where we could match the top teams and it felt so so good, for then to throw it all away for this year with a draggy car. Almost to the extent of when williams completely ruined their car years ago. So yes im clouded by the dissapointment this year, but mclaren need to gradually chip away on all areas and this year i didnt see the car close in any configuration or type of track.
Cost cap: When cost cap overspend rumors started, one just knew it was not mclaren. As expected it was rb, and then aston martin with a technicality. But why RB, because they will always push to the limit with everything, sometimes a bit over, and i really miss some of that agressive mindset at mclaren.
mwillems wrote: ↑21 Nov 2022, 13:45I don't want to put everything on James Key. The brake issue is not something I would directly attribute to him. If not for that then we might have had 4th, as we'd have brought upgrades much earlier, been a little faster over the whole year and possibly had one more upgrade to bring, so to be honest I think we would have had fourth.
It's also not James Keys fault that Daniel couldn't bring the points home. if we'd had another driver in and around Lando we would have been clear 4th fastest team.
And if these two disasters hadn't struck then perhaps we'd be fighting for (but probably losing) 3rd.
But I am interested to see what the team produce next year, the chance for excuses are running out and if we don't get results in '23 then I'd not be against a new design team in time for the new tunnel.
Binotto will be rehomed in Ferrari and will be around to tap up next year if needed, if indeed he'd consider leaving the Ferrari family. and I can't see him going to another team.