Usually by December, the basic look of the chassis has already been determined, and work is underway on details and updates for the season.
damn I hope not... considering Aston and Alpine believe their next car is a big step up.Mcl_G10 wrote: ↑22 Nov 2022, 08:06I am currently waiting on more information on specifics, hopefully get some more detail on monday. What i have been told so far is that "the car is slow" and "the designers/engineers are not happy." Those were his words to my friend.CjC wrote: ↑21 Nov 2022, 21:41What isn’t particularly good? The 2023 car?Mcl_G10 wrote: ↑21 Nov 2022, 12:31Hello, i am a registered new member to the site but a long long time lurker. I just love the technical information and insights from this site and im glad its here for us as fans because otherwise there is very little that f1 as a whole provides to armchair fans in a technical capacity other than hyperbole and the basic info.
Anyway. I happen to have a friend that i work with who is a friend of an employee of mclaren. My work friend likes f1 but is overall very clueless with all techincalities so his information to me often very lazy and generalised. Anyway this guy that my workfriend is friends with is part of the team that travels over to germany to use toyotas wind tunnel. I believe he is some kind of test driver although i am yet to verify this.
Fingers crosses i can provide some insight over time and bits of info here and there.I must admit that the early information i am hearing is not particularly good.
If what i have said is not deemed appropriate for whatever reason then i apologise and was all intended in good faith. Thanks
Quite possibly.
Exactly. No chance of turning a bad car into a good one.
‘McLaren’s new signing Piastri was the cause of the first red flag, following a minor technical anomaly that prompted a precautionary stoppage on-track.’
Sounds like it was precautionary and he has since been out to complete 50 laps in the first 4 hours which isn't bad going.
From what’s been explained, it’s not that brake issues are being carried over to the 2023 car, just the legacy of the disruption it caused into car development. So it appears that the time, resources spent rectifying it had serious enough implications that the 2023 car development is on the back foot. So I guess they’re playing catch up a bit.Big Tea wrote: ↑22 Nov 2022, 13:59Can anyone shed light on what the 'Brake Issues' actually are? Seems strange that a known issue is carried over to a new car.
Makes me wonder why? at the extreme, surely a new supplier or design would be different enough to change it?
What can not be replaced?
Edit
Sorry for all the question marks, but I am confused??? (as Normal for me)
There aren’t any “known” break issues in the 2023 car… What is been taken out of context is Seidl saying that the fact that they had to allocate resources (time / people) into fixing and dealing with the situation meant that it pushed out development further into the season… Therefore they didn’t start working on the 2023 car as soon as they planned to, so they are behind it’s development from their original plan point of view… If they were planning to allocate 6 months of development to the 2023 car, they ended with 4 or 5 instead (numbers made by me to illustrate the point).Big Tea wrote: ↑22 Nov 2022, 13:59Can anyone shed light on what the 'Brake Issues' actually are? Seems strange that a known issue is carried over to a new car.
Makes me wonder why? at the extreme, surely a new supplier or design would be different enough to change it?
What can not be replaced?
Edit
Sorry for all the question marks, but I am confused??? (as Normal for me)
Yes..very good analysis. Also I have spoted some differences between MCL36 and the show car with new Vuse colours. Even rear wing shape is different. I hope all changes to cut the gap to Top3.
(and SmallSoldier)