Not "Combustion efficiency" - "Thermal efficiency".saviour stivala wrote: ↑09 Feb 2023, 01:23. . . developments efforts were concentrated fully on combustion efficiency. . . .
capping may only mean using what they have already been usinggodlameroso wrote: ↑09 Feb 2023, 16:01The new power units will have even less thermal efficiency than the current ones.
They're capping compression ratio at 16:1, where it is currently 18:1, boost is also capped at 3.8 bar/55 psi.
So if BTE in self sustain is around 51% that puts MGU-H power at about 75kW. I’ve seen various figures between 50 and 52%.Tommy Cookers wrote: ↑09 Feb 2023, 16:34capping may only mean using what they have already been usinggodlameroso wrote: ↑09 Feb 2023, 16:01The new power units will have even less thermal efficiency than the current ones.
They're capping compression ratio at 16:1, where it is currently 18:1, boost is also capped at 3.8 bar/55 psi.
Mercedes said the biggest TE improvement came from the turbine recovery
this has now been eliminated - so BTE will be c.45%
4.8A, I read that to mean absolute.saviour stivala wrote: ↑09 Feb 2023, 17:22FIA F1 2026 power unit technical regulations. 5.5.2 Engine inlet air pressure must be less than 4.8 bar.
Unless specified in a appendix, I would do with manometric and a good lawyer.godlameroso wrote: ↑09 Feb 2023, 18:394.8A, I read that to mean absolute.saviour stivala wrote: ↑09 Feb 2023, 17:22FIA F1 2026 power unit technical regulations. 5.5.2 Engine inlet air pressure must be less than 4.8 bar.
If this is the case and being in a competitive environment it puts the ball in court of fuel design. As I have mentioned elsewhere the fuel construct regulations are not as restrictive as thought by the public.godlameroso wrote: ↑09 Feb 2023, 16:01The new power units will have even less thermal efficiency than the current ones. They're capping compression ratio at 16:1, where it is currently 18:1, boost is also capped at 3.8 bar/55 psi. These turbo regulations seem a bit strange to me, they're basically allowing a turbo that can flow enough for 1500 HP, but these engines aren't going to see anywhere near that. A Garrett GTX4709 with an 80mm housing, is roughly what the regulations are specifying for a turbo. Surely the F1 version will cost 20x what an off the shelf one will cost. It's like the regulations are forcing you to make a turbo that's slightly too big for the engine displacement, like they're trying to bring back turbo lag.
I think they have have admitted that, saying that it would make it more difficult for the drivers and more spectacular for the spectators.godlameroso wrote: ↑09 Feb 2023, 16:01It's like the regulations are forcing you to make a turbo that's slightly too big for the engine displacement, like they're trying to bring back turbo lag.
It is.godlameroso wrote: ↑09 Feb 2023, 18:394.8A, I read that to mean absolute.saviour stivala wrote: ↑09 Feb 2023, 17:22FIA F1 2026 power unit technical regulations. 5.5.2 Engine inlet air pressure must be less than 4.8 bar.
They are aiming for 400kW from the ICE from 3,000MJ/hr fuel energy flow. That equates to 48% TE.Tommy Cookers wrote: ↑09 Feb 2023, 16:34capping may only mean using what they have already been usinggodlameroso wrote: ↑09 Feb 2023, 16:01The new power units will have even less thermal efficiency than the current ones.
They're capping compression ratio at 16:1, where it is currently 18:1, boost is also capped at 3.8 bar/55 psi.
Mercedes said the biggest TE improvement came from the turbine recovery
this has now been eliminated - so BTE will be c.45%