Ferrari SF23

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
matteosc
matteosc
30
Joined: 11 Sep 2012, 17:07

Re: Ferrari SF23

Post

gordonthegun wrote:
15 Feb 2023, 22:11
Change in rear brakes cooling intake:

https://storage.googleapis.com/the-race ... r-susp.jpg
Nice picture to appreciate the bigger undercut of SF-23 and the smaller floor stay (not sure it is the proper name).

Andi76
Andi76
431
Joined: 03 Feb 2021, 20:19

Re: Ferrari SF23

Post

Giando wrote:
15 Feb 2023, 18:57
Pictures are coming in...

https://postimg.cc/ctG9g5Gc

https://postimg.cc/8jHKcHKh
There is no doubt that the suspension itself is higher than last year. Like i said yesterday - its clearly visible at the pick-up points at the front.But your new images show that they probably indeed lowered the rear lower wishbone for more anti-dive. Testing will give us better images, so we can finally discovers it this is a pic-up point for the rear lower wishbone, or something else. But you might actually have been right in relation to the lower rear wishbone.

User avatar
godlameroso
309
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 21:27
Location: Miami FL

Re: Ferrari SF23

Post



Little porpoising if at all. =D>
Saishū kōnā

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
559
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: Ferrari SF23

Post

Andi76 wrote:
15 Feb 2023, 23:02
Giando wrote:
15 Feb 2023, 18:57
Pictures are coming in...

https://postimg.cc/ctG9g5Gc

https://postimg.cc/8jHKcHKh
There is no doubt that the suspension itself is higher than last year. Like i said yesterday - its clearly visible at the pick-up points at the front.But your new images show that they probably indeed lowered the rear lower wishbone for more anti-dive. Testing will give us better images, so we can finally discovers it this is a pic-up point for the rear lower wishbone, or something else. But you might actually have been right in relation to the lower rear wishbone.
There is doubt. Looks the same to me. The change in position of the tie rod playing tricks on your eyes I think.
🖐️✌️☝️👀👌✍️🐎🏆🙏

Racing Green in 2028

Andi76
Andi76
431
Joined: 03 Feb 2021, 20:19

Re: Ferrari SF23

Post

PlatinumZealot wrote:
16 Feb 2023, 03:43
Andi76 wrote:
15 Feb 2023, 23:02
Giando wrote:
15 Feb 2023, 18:57
Pictures are coming in...

https://postimg.cc/ctG9g5Gc

https://postimg.cc/8jHKcHKh
There is no doubt that the suspension itself is higher than last year. Like i said yesterday - its clearly visible at the pick-up points at the front.But your new images show that they probably indeed lowered the rear lower wishbone for more anti-dive. Testing will give us better images, so we can finally discovers it this is a pic-up point for the rear lower wishbone, or something else. But you might actually have been right in relation to the lower rear wishbone.
There is doubt. Looks the same to me. The change in position of the tie rod playing tricks on your eyes I think.
Possible, but I believe it less - Giorgio Piola has reported the same at motorsport.com - that the front suspension wishbones were raised. Giorgio usually is very precise about things like that.
godlameroso wrote:
16 Feb 2023, 02:39


Little porpoising if at all. =D>
It was indeed reported that there was no porpoising at all.

Sevach
Sevach
1081
Joined: 07 Jun 2012, 17:00

Re: Ferrari SF23

Post

SmallSoldier wrote:
15 Feb 2023, 19:08
https://i.imgur.com/FcdHiYb.jpg

Pictures by Federico Basile
The vane outside the FW endplate seems to have a concave shape, creating a semi-tunnel/channel.

User avatar
F1NAC
170
Joined: 31 Mar 2013, 22:35

Re: Ferrari SF23

Post

better view on front suspension. Here it's visible sloped arms. Both, top and bottom wishbone

Image

User avatar
gordonthegun
254
Joined: 28 Mar 2019, 23:33
Location: Monza, Italy.

Re: Ferrari SF23

Post

F1NAC wrote:
16 Feb 2023, 08:41
better view on front suspension. Here it's visible sloped arms. Both, top and bottom wishbone

Image
Beautiful shot.
You can see how the cameras are aligned with the front upper arm.
Zooming in, you notice the brake cooling duct going downwards, the small vertical air intakes under those of the sidepods, then the entrance to the Venturi channels and the shape of the flow diverters in that area, the tea-tray, and... everything... =D>
Last edited by gordonthegun on 16 Feb 2023, 11:38, edited 1 time in total.

wowgr8
wowgr8
29
Joined: 11 Feb 2020, 20:35

Re: Ferrari SF23

Post

How exactly does that "antidive" arrangement like we saw on the Red Bull impact performance?

Sevach
Sevach
1081
Joined: 07 Jun 2012, 17:00

Re: Ferrari SF23

Post

wowgr8 wrote:
16 Feb 2023, 11:34
How exactly does that "antidive" arrangement like we saw on the Red Bull impact performance?
Hard to gage how much of the RB18 characteristics can be tracked to it...
Straightline speed? Probably not, but if the rear is squating more than the front with speed(downforce) it could help.
Slightly understeery? Probably had something to do with it, if they had a front that hunkered down under braking it would certainly mean better front end grip.
On the other hand, it may not have been as gentle on the rears during a stint.

PhillipM
PhillipM
386
Joined: 16 May 2011, 15:18
Location: Over the road from Boothy...

Re: Ferrari SF23

Post

wowgr8 wrote:
16 Feb 2023, 11:34
How exactly does that "antidive" arrangement like we saw on the Red Bull impact performance?
Its not 'antidive' unless it's the upper wishbone canted backwards compared to the bottom, a lot of people keep making this mistake.
Canting both wishbones backwards together is actually pro-dive.

wowgr8
wowgr8
29
Joined: 11 Feb 2020, 20:35

Re: Ferrari SF23

Post

PhillipM wrote:
16 Feb 2023, 14:33
Its not 'antidive' unless it's the upper wishbone canted backwards compared to the bottom, a lot of people keep making this mistake.
Canting both wishbones backwards together is actually pro-dive.
Alright. How does it impact performance?

User avatar
nico5
21
Joined: 12 Mar 2017, 18:55

Re: Ferrari SF23

Post

PhillipM wrote:
16 Feb 2023, 14:33
wowgr8 wrote:
16 Feb 2023, 11:34
How exactly does that "antidive" arrangement like we saw on the Red Bull impact performance?
Its not 'antidive' unless it's the upper wishbone canted backwards compared to the bottom
...which it definitely is...

PhillipM
PhillipM
386
Joined: 16 May 2011, 15:18
Location: Over the road from Boothy...

Re: Ferrari SF23

Post

Depends exactly how much they had before tbfh. Generally with more anti-dive you'll trade for slightly more initial grip on hard braking, better control of the aero platform on the brakes as the car will stay more level, at the expense of suspension compliance, especially if you're anywhere you need to trail brake over a kerb, etc.
You also get less feedback for the driver on what the car is doing under braking (see Ricciardo struggling with any car with a stiff setup for the aero platform since RB), you can also get high frequency chatter that makes it easy to lock a wheel as the tyre and suspension get in a feedback loop near the limits.
Plus depending on your aero platform some dive might be a good thing to bring the aero CoP forward while braking on the entry into a corner. Some cars of course the dip in ride height or bottoming might be more of an issue so you don't want that.

It's not really a case of more is better for any way you go, it has to be match to the characteristics of your car and your aero, and even a little to your drivers preferences, that's why you see teams tweaking it every year instead of leaving it on one 'best' setting.
It's also why most people laugh when people claim someone like RB or Merc or similar found some sort of magic bullet with anti dive canted wishbones or PoU type stuff. The answer depends on the rest of the car, not looking at it and going 'that looks better'
Last edited by PhillipM on 16 Feb 2023, 19:00, edited 3 times in total.

PhillipM
PhillipM
386
Joined: 16 May 2011, 15:18
Location: Over the road from Boothy...

Re: Ferrari SF23

Post

nico5 wrote:
16 Feb 2023, 15:02

...which it definitely is...
All the F1 cars are, they all run antidive. The trick there is how much relatively. They might have canted both wishbones and actually ended up with less AD, not more. But a lot of people seem to just see a tilted wishbone and start exclaiming it's some sort of magic anti-dive philosophy like happened with RB the other year.

If you just took two parallel wishbones and rotated the rear links downwards to angle them. You'd end up with pro-dive, not anti-dive, because of the kinematic wheel recession.