CjC wrote: ↑25 Feb 2023, 14:53
McL-H wrote: ↑25 Feb 2023, 14:46
Chicane wrote: ↑25 Feb 2023, 14:25
When you make a big course correction regarding aerodynamic direction, three fourth of the way in to development you are not only going to be playing catch up all season long but also end up compromising the development schedule of next year's car as well. It is not just about time but the fact that a cost cap is in place makes it really challenging to manage their resource allocation.
Exactly this. You either compromise this year or next year when you’re on the back foot in current F1.
To both posters…. Aren’t the current cars just an evolution of their predecessors though?
So any development done to the 23 car, especially aero could be carried over to the 24 car?
It all depends on the 2024 concept on whether the 2023 parts can carry over.
If they’d retain the same design philosophy, than probably yes. If McLaren starts using their new facilities and their findings would lead to a different philosophy, than it could be yes for some parts and no for other parts. While knowledge carries over either way.
But if for example in a few months the team finds out and decides it needs to alter its rear suspension, then it can’t do so any more for 2023. If they were to change the suspension for 2024, this would likely change the gearbox too, could impact packaging, and thus aerodynamics. It all affects the concept of the new car and thus concept changes for 2024 can affect compatibility of 2023 parts on the 2024 car.