Is Sargent Canadian?
relic of latifi
Most Americans secretly want to be Canadian anyway right?
Hope Vowles changes his viewpoint after this race.McMika98 wrote: ↑05 Mar 2023, 14:21https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/vowl ... /10439499/
Not sure if this is the right decision, hope he was just making excuses for a car that was not his responsibility. The car turns out to be pretty decent and not too far off even the top teams, they should not abandon development whilst other will be hoping to make gains.
The team has the highest number of wind tunnel hours allocated which they should maximise, heck do a sneaky deal with Toto whose team have little knowledge of the sidepod concept and now have given up the zero pod concept. They have a good baseline to push towards front midfield so why focus on 3years down the line which might not work.
Great race by both drivers, Logan was super impressive. The higher downforce was a better race option for deg but Albon once again managed to pull out a classic drive to get a well deserved point. The team has the outright race pace of midfield and they should try to go for more downforce instead of their patented low downforce hope we get in front of a DRS train somehow and hold onto a position.EJ22B wrote: ↑05 Mar 2023, 19:13Albon is using the same rear wing the team used in circuits like Baku and Monza. So it wasn't surprise he was killing his tyres so early whereas Logan was running the maximum high downforce rear wing.
Anyway, great race for the team. Points in the first race is a good start to the season.
I don't understand his point. The Capex investment is a fixed amount of 36m over a period of four years and not part of the seasonal cost cap. Therefore they should be able to upgrade the car through the season without interfering with the Capex.Vowles still says after the performance in Bahrain that the development on the FW45 will still be limited as he wants to invest in the technical capabilities, systems and tools to be competitive in 2024 and 25.
The correct interpretation is that you are permitted 36m of excluded cost towards Capex investment. Any additional capex investment would have to come out of the budget cap. If the team wants to spend 100 million on infrastructure then 64m will have to come out of the budget cap. 36m is excluded cost.EJ22B wrote: ↑09 Mar 2023, 22:42https://www.williamsf1.com/posts/461502 ... ct-bahrain
I don't understand his point. The Capex investment is a fixed amount of 36m over a period of four years and not part of the seasonal cost cap. Therefore they should be able to upgrade the car through the season without interfering with the Capex.Vowles still says after the performance in Bahrain that the development on the FW45 will still be limited as he wants to invest in the technical capabilities, systems and tools to be competitive in 2024 and 25.
Don't like the deja vu of every new leader going in the constant spiral of restructure and long term focus. Capito said similar stuff about long term focus and implementation. It appears they had a major restructure last year which supposedly is the reason for this year car gains but now we want another fresh pair of eyes. It will be a massive distraction for the entire workforce.EJ22B wrote: ↑09 Mar 2023, 22:42https://www.williamsf1.com/posts/461502 ... ct-bahrain
I don't understand his point. The Capex investment is a fixed amount of 36m over a period of four years and not part of the seasonal cost cap. Therefore they should be able to upgrade the car through the season without interfering with the Capex.Vowles still says after the performance in Bahrain that the development on the FW45 will still be limited as he wants to invest in the technical capabilities, systems and tools to be competitive in 2024 and 25.