Wouter wrote: ↑11 Mar 2023, 12:15
snajam wrote: ↑11 Mar 2023, 11:40
Wouter wrote: ↑11 Mar 2023, 10:23
.
Is that so?
.
.
Isn't it? That last paragraph is exactly what I mean,
an unnecessary and false dig, how is the Amr23 last year's RB? How is it copying? They're just subtle ways of taking credit for others work. I've usually sided with RB when it makes sense but unfortunately it seems the non technical brass (including checo) have gone blind.
You wont hear these statements from Newey,
as they are factually untrue. Never did we hear Alpine accusing amr when the most unique visible feature on the car comes from them.
.
Dream On! Dan Fallows has worked with Newey for 15 years and knows his way of working inside out.
It's only natural that he remembers his good designs and uses some of it.
Dan has always been highly appreciative of Newey and has learned a lot from him, doesn't mean that he can't come up with his own ideas or every good idea on the grid somehow comes from newey and the rest are only copiers.
Anyway the argument was and it still holds that the car is not an RB18 copy, visually and from what can be seen of the floor. So the statements from the RB camp are untrue, unless you can provide concrete contrary evidence via pictures instead of 'dream on'.