Too much of a financial burden for the team.. I think a works deal would be a better option. Getting back with Honda would be the best option...
BMMR61 wrote: ↑13 Mar 2023, 13:55Data correlation is huge in this sport. Get it right then you can engineer strong aero and make steady progress. The trends since McLaren started it’s recovery have been in two major phases;
1. 2019 - Italy and Russia in 2021, and
2. Thereafter
The first was steady improvement leading to those aforementioned races that produced the team’s 1-2 and Lando’s pole and race dominance until the rain arrived.
Then a period of decline with lacklustre development and a mediocre MCL36 last year.
Why do I labour the point? Because some fans and journalists have for some time been painting a picture of doom for McLaren. My take, and thankfully it’s shared by some here is as follows;
The team saw the unfolding of a “blind alley” in design parameters of the MCL60, blew time out on that direction and traced a new path. They awoke the public to the misstep and predicted a slow start to 2023, born out in practice and qualifying to be true. However the “unfinished” new car, if not exactly shining in the race, produced surprising pace and deg. Surprising to the engineering team and those fans who without cheerleading saw the hint of promise in the car at this premature stage of conception.
So back to the correlation word. Correlation is especially for wind tunnel and more particularly new wind tunnel. The most advanced tunnel is useless without good correlation, this is my biggest concern for McLaren’s medium term progress.
Last year our reliability was top notch, recovery from slow start was decent, pit stops second only to RB, tactics very good. Losing Seidl was disappointing but I’m sure we’re going to see some good signings before 2024. I remain confident that Piastri will prove an inspired choice for the future ahead (and I’m not Australian!”
I don't remember the team talking how much potential their development path has. This does seem out of character. Maybe it is just leadership style of Stella?mwillems wrote: ↑14 Mar 2023, 00:11I'm not sure I'd go so far for as saying bullish, they are still targeting a quite modest 4th fastest car by seasons end, but you can certainly feel the optimism from Mclaren.
But I suppose what happens depends as much whether other teams also can see similar gains ahead, this is something that we or Mclaren can not know. Exciting to see though!
Well, what they actually said was a top four car, at the time I assume they thought mixing it RB, Merc & Ferrari, or at least at the back of that fightmwillems wrote: ↑14 Mar 2023, 00:11I'm not sure I'd go so far for as saying bullish, they are still targeting a quite modest 4th fastest car by seasons end, but you can certainly feel the optimism from Mclaren.
But I suppose what happens depends as much whether other teams also can see similar gains ahead, this is something that we or Mclaren can not know. Exciting to see though!
When a car gets its downforce at the high expense of top seep its called draggy.
Totally, they are being very up front but bullish to me suggests they think they can get in the mix, but they are just saying 4th fastest car by seasons end. That's just the progress I expect to see.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑14 Mar 2023, 09:49I don't remember the team talking how much potential their development path has. This does seem out of character. Maybe it is just leadership style of Stella?mwillems wrote: ↑14 Mar 2023, 00:11I'm not sure I'd go so far for as saying bullish, they are still targeting a quite modest 4th fastest car by seasons end, but you can certainly feel the optimism from Mclaren.
But I suppose what happens depends as much whether other teams also can see similar gains ahead, this is something that we or Mclaren can not know. Exciting to see though!