That guy will get a nice retirement fund selling those photos to rival teams. Or maybe RB will pay him off….
That guy will get a nice retirement fund selling those photos to rival teams. Or maybe RB will pay him off….
So now this will be photoshot money not just catering LOL. Sorry for off tangent.
Why? RB tended to have magic bullets like, flex wings and blown diffusers, that others needed to copy.marcel171281 wrote: ↑29 Mar 2023, 11:04I just don't get all this speculation about the RB DRS. It is just a DRS like any DRS, there is no magic bullet. It is just a very good and slipery design, with yet plenty downforce.atanatizante wrote: ↑28 Mar 2023, 14:36Another Italian YouTuber (click auto-translate for English) suggests that at certain loads the beam wing and diffuser are stalling inducing a kind of triple DRS effect. Could it be right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMclnOtSJGY
There is nothing unique about it. Honda has developed an MGUK that allows it to recover greater amounts of energy in a very short time than its competitors. This has been confirmed by telemetry data already. Where other teams run dry at the end of the lap, the Honda engine still has battery juice left. But this comes at a price: drivability. That's why Max is always on the radio with his engineer about the downshifts. They fine tune the mappings/settings for the car's energy recovery.vorticism wrote: ↑01 Apr 2023, 19:16If this is occurring, what are they doing that is unique in terms of driveline braking? Whether by the engine or the MGUK.
Engine braking would imply something unique within the engine itself. However most of the primary engine geometry is identical for all of the engine suppliers. MGUK operates through the crankshaft and only supplies ~1/5 of overall power.
The advantage isn't coming from just the MGU-K braking. Honda's advantage is also about the MGU-H recovery which passes to the battery. I cannot find the article yet, but it was explained that Honda made a choice to sacrifice peak power of the ICE, in order to have better MGU-H performance (or something to that effect).gandharva wrote: ↑01 Apr 2023, 22:33There is nothing unique about it. Honda has developed an MGUK that allows it to recover greater amounts of energy in a very short time than its competitors. This has been confirmed by telemetry data already. Where other teams run dry at the end of the lap, the Honda engine still has battery juice left. But this comes at a price: drivability. That's why Max is always on the radio with his engineer about the downshifts. They fine tune the mappings/settings for the car's energy recovery.vorticism wrote: ↑01 Apr 2023, 19:16If this is occurring, what are they doing that is unique in terms of driveline braking? Whether by the engine or the MGUK.
Engine braking would imply something unique within the engine itself. However most of the primary engine geometry is identical for all of the engine suppliers. MGUK operates through the crankshaft and only supplies ~1/5 of overall power.
If these mappings, which are presumably very aggressive, are not tuned perfectly, there will be drivability problems under braking and this might lead to a driver becoming insecure and prone to making mistakes. I think that's what we saw with Perez this weekend.
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-_sTIu0ybGnk/ ... S%2B01.jpg
I think it is, because if it were that simple, that you just use more MGU-K retardation to recover more energy (hmmm why didn't I think of that 3 years ago ), then everyone would be doing it because it's just a software change and you would never observe the gap we see today. The actual difference between the Honda/Ferrari/Merc is more likely to be attributed to the fundamental decisions regarding the MGU-H which cannot be changed in the PU homologation.
What are these? Drive pins? It seems like this would make the wheel harder to mount when fast pit stop is needed.vorticism wrote: ↑02 Apr 2023, 05:44First look at a RB 18" wheel:
https://cdn-2.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... car-1.webp
Matt Sutton
motorsport.com