AR3-GP wrote: ↑25 May 2023, 15:35
Macklaren wrote: ↑25 May 2023, 15:25
And RBR won 4 titles with a customer engine. And Williams was regularly getting podiums a decade ago with a customer engine. And Alpine's works engine sucks. Enough with the blanket statements
Red Bull's relationship with Renault was not "customer". The relationship was such that Red Bull got Renault to build them an engine that was compatible with the blown exhaust concept. Renault didn't even official F1 team after 2010. They sold the team. Red Bull was the factory. This would never happen now. Mercedes will do what's best for themselves first.
Williams was getting podiums because the Mercedes had 80-90hp more than everyone else. Look where they are now that PUs are more equal.
You have an F1 expert, and leader of a team that is currently quite a bit of ahead of Mclaren telling you the importance of the PU-chassis integration. What is there left to say? I take Krack's statement with full value and credibility.
The potentially worrying part for Mclaren is that Honda, RBPT, and Audi do not appear to want to supply Mclaren and mostly for reasons related to wanting to focus on themselves. Audi said they focus on themselves. RBPT said they focus on themselves. Honda have already snubbed Mclaren with the AMR announcement.
Having a pure customer relationship is a weakness no matter how much one would not like it to be.
Not saying his statement is wrong, but you have the Technical head of a Team that just signed a “works deal” hyping the importance of it? What did you expect, for him to say that it doesn’t really matter in this formula?
Are there potential benefits of been a works team? Absolutely… Will that make or break the potential for a WCC opportunity ? Doubt it
All those examples of “Works Teams” having success are based on an era that:
- Had no regulations in terms of what was provided from an engine manufacturer to a customer team, it could very well be 2 completely different engines if they wanted to… Today, that’s not possible
- An era in which budgets weren’t capped, therefore the benefit of an engine works deal wasn’t only the engines themselves (and their integration) but actually the amount of money that engine manufacturer invested on the business… Therefore the positives results were more due to the investment than the engine itself.
- An era where power differences between engine manufacturers was way bigger than what it is today.
- An era with less amount of regulations, not only on the car side, but more importantly in the engine side… To the point that next generations engines could be consider “quasi-spec”.
- There is way more correlation between budgets and results in the last several decades than whether a team was a works team or not… Money was the differentiator in terms of performance.
- There are more examples of “Works Teams” not successful than examples of successful ones (Ferrari, Renault?)
In regards to McLaren, which is what this thread is about… There is a lot that needs to be improved for the Team to challenge for a Championship that won’t be fixed by a “works deal”… When another customer team using the same engine you are using is ahead of you, it’s not the engine that is the problem.
The need to be a works team in order to be successful in today’s F1 is a myth