Here's a better shot of the mirror, courtesy of F1ingenerale:
looks to be on Sainz' car only for comparison.
edit: wrong image posted
That would give excellent corellation/data analysis, along with the data set from last year (it was pretty rapid that weekend) to produce a lot of valid comparison for the team.gordonthegun wrote: ↑01 Jun 2023, 14:35Do you think possible that they are configuring two cars with different setup and components?
Maybe one with the old RW/rear-suspensions/sidepods/floor/mirrors and the other with the new ones for a more effective comparison.
For friday FP? Absolutely.gordonthegun wrote: ↑01 Jun 2023, 14:35Do you think possible that they are configuring two cars with different setup and components?
Maybe one with the old RW/rear-suspensions/sidepods/floor/mirrors and the other with the new ones for a more effective comparison.
Redbull Sidepods are coming according to formu1a.uno and they are reliableVanja #66 wrote: ↑01 Jun 2023, 14:122022 mid/high downforce wing spec also with single pylon. The 2-pylon spec must be there for spare parts then.
The track did speed up a lot with new configuration, so it's possible maximum downforce is no longer needed. Front left tyre will suffer the most and the track is not rear limited in this new configuration at all. So, you don't need as much rear loading now, making it possible to cut some rear downforce and drag.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FxiPEAjXsAE ... ame=medium
Also, as expected, no downwash sidepods. Nugnes strikes out again Front wing with the same load as Monaco, unsurprisingly.
https://www.racefans.net/wp-content/upl ... _HiRes.jpg
Autosport report the sameVenturiation wrote: ↑01 Jun 2023, 16:10Redbull Sidepods are coming according to formu1a.uno and they are reliable
They will probably run 1 upgraded car and 1 old to compareorganic wrote: ↑01 Jun 2023, 16:11Autosport report the sameVenturiation wrote: ↑01 Jun 2023, 16:10Redbull Sidepods are coming according to formu1a.uno and they are reliable
We'll probably have pictures of them before the end of the day
If that’s the case, can’t be a huge change if the car can be reconfigured overnight.
Yes, louvres area seems convex. Possibly leading to cannon-shaped exit?Sevach wrote: ↑01 Jun 2023, 16:22https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/ferr ... /10476762/
The english version of Motorsport also corroborating.
https://cdn-6.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... ail-1.webp
The old version is still here.
https://cdn-4.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... ont-1.webp
https://cdn-6.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... ont-1.webp
https://cdn-3.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... ver-1.webp
Can't be sure if that's the new pods, but there's some different fins here.
They are saying redbull sidepodsing. wrote: ↑01 Jun 2023, 16:32If that’s the case, can’t be a huge change if the car can be reconfigured overnight.
Seems to me the sidepod cooling layout is similar so maybe just changes to the sidepod trailing edge and maybe undercut treatment.
Also, I understand doing A - B testing, but seems almost due to lack of confidence in their analytical tools than anything else. They seem to do this a lot and wastes an opportunity to get set-up learning across two cars. For comparison, Merc ran both cars in updated configuration last race with no back-to-back testing.