Newey vs Brawn

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.

I like Ross Brawn, and I like Adrian Newey. But.. Which is better. Only one way to find out...

Fight!!
18
44%
Adrian Newey
5
12%
Ross Brawn
18
44%
 
Total votes: 41

sunny1304
sunny1304
0
Joined: 23 Sep 2008, 13:29

Re: Brawn and Newey

Post

it would be great to see both of them working for the same team ...

as you said ROSS knows to employ right people in the right place and NEWAY is the best man in his place.so ROSS could bring out NEWAY's best.

so there migt be no conflict......they could work together with a great relationship.

DaveKillens
DaveKillens
34
Joined: 20 Jan 2005, 04:02

Re: Brawn and Newey

Post

xpensive wrote:Perhaps Newey and Rory Byrne would be a better comparison?
That's my opinion too. Both Newey and Byrne are head and shoulders above the rest right now. From 1992 through 2004 the World Drivers' Championship was an exclusive battle between 'Schuey' and 'Newey', with Rory Byrne engineering Michael Schumacher to 7 titles whilst Adrian Newey engineered Mansell, Prost, Hill, Villeneuve and Häkkinen to 6 titles.

It's nice to fantasize about a "dream team", be it football or Formula One. And pairing Newey with Brawn would be very exciting and interesting.
Racing should be decided on the track, not the court room.

sunny1304
sunny1304
0
Joined: 23 Sep 2008, 13:29

Re: Brawn and Newey

Post

DaveKillens wrote: And pairing Newey with Brawn would be very exciting and interesting.

and expensive also. :wink: :wink:

User avatar
freedom_honda
0
Joined: 23 Jul 2007, 04:12

Re: Brawn and Newey

Post

In my opinion it would be bloody boring for F1. Ross is the best team principle in F1, and Neway is the best designer in F1. Like someone said above, Ross can probably bring the best out of Neway with his excellent resources management skill. But I think their finishing product would be so damn quick it might be even more dominating than the F2004 or the MP4/4.

xpensive
xpensive
214
Joined: 22 Nov 2008, 18:06
Location: Somewhere in Scandinavia

Re: Brawn and Newey

Post

I think a "historic" pairing of John Barnard with Mike Gascoyne would have been interesting to behold, two autocrats, both with the self confidence of a T-Rex.

If we then could add Jean Alesi and Nigel Mansell as drivers, there would not have been a boring second.
"I spent most of my money on wine and women...I wasted the rest"

oj1983
oj1983
0
Joined: 03 Aug 2008, 02:36

Re: Brawn and Newey

Post

And then maybe Flavio as Team Principal just for good measure!! :lol:

Belatti
Belatti
33
Joined: 10 Jul 2007, 21:48
Location: Argentina

Re: Brawn and Newey

Post

James_graham wrote: Over the past years, apart from the renault cars, they have been involved with the cars who have won the F1 championship all be it with Mclaren, Ferrari and Williams.
And Benetton...
sunny1304 wrote:
DaveKillens wrote: And pairing Newey with Brawn would be very exciting and interesting.

and expensive also. :wink: :wink:
Its not expensive if you win :wink:
"You need great passion, because everything you do with great pleasure, you do well." -Juan Manuel Fangio

"I have no idols. I admire work, dedication and competence." -Ayrton Senna

xpensive
xpensive
214
Joined: 22 Nov 2008, 18:06
Location: Somewhere in Scandinavia

Re: Brawn and Newey

Post

For oj1983: Perhaps with Nigel Stepney and Mike Coughlan trusted with the department of intellectual property?
"I spent most of my money on wine and women...I wasted the rest"

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: Brawn and Newey

Post

xpensive wrote:.. Perhaps with Nigel Stepney and Mike Coughlan trusted with the department of intellectual property?
ROFLMAO this made my day.

The two guys in question both have a wonderfull knack to prioritise technical issues and advance those that are likely to result in performance jumps. It made them effective technical directors.

I see this talent even more broadly impersonated in Ross Brawn. He also has shown his talent in race engineering and in people management by turning a whole team around from what can only be described as FUBAR.

A fast car is 90% of what is needed in F1 (2007 McLaren proof that you can mess up even that) and so the additional capabilities of Brawn may be underestimated.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

oj1983
oj1983
0
Joined: 03 Aug 2008, 02:36

Re: Brawn and Newey

Post

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

This makes me think of the days of when you could break into a rival's garage and take photos of their cars overnight!! Now that was proper espionage!!!

xpensive
xpensive
214
Joined: 22 Nov 2008, 18:06
Location: Somewhere in Scandinavia

Re: Brawn and Newey

Post

Jean-Pierre van Rossem and Andrea Sasetti in charge of finances?

And if that doesn't make it rowdy enough, how about Gunther Schmid as Race strategy supervisor, WB?
"I spent most of my money on wine and women...I wasted the rest"

User avatar
tk421
0
Joined: 12 Jan 2009, 21:34

Re: Brawn and Newey

Post

freedom_honda wrote:In my opinion it would be bloody boring for F1. I think their finishing product would be so damn quick it might be even more dominating than the F2004 or the MP4/4.
I agree. Brawn alone has made F1 boring thus far, and Newey, if Brawn didn't make it to the grid this year, would have done the same. If they teamed up, every race would be a foregone conclusion. Although I feel this way about them on the same team, I also believe they are the best of the best in their roles, respectively. I'd much rather see them compete with one another, and on that note, I hope Red Bull's Silverstone pace wasn't a fluke so the championship isn't such a yawn.
Best regards. I guess this explains why I'm not at my post!

Michiba
Michiba
4
Joined: 28 Apr 2008, 08:58

Re: Brawn and Newey

Post

This reminds me of an article in F1 magazine a few years ago, where they compared Newey to Schumacher (even more indirect comparison). At that time, it showed Newey to be on top in terms of wins/points etc (with his winning cars from williams and mac at the time). Perhaps Schuey has come out on top since then.

DaveKillens
DaveKillens
34
Joined: 20 Jan 2005, 04:02

Re: Brawn and Newey

Post

DaveKillens wrote:From 1992 through 2004 the World Drivers' Championship was an exclusive battle between 'Schuey' and 'Newey', with Rory Byrne engineering Michael Schumacher to 7 titles whilst Adrian Newey engineered Mansell, Prost, Hill, Villeneuve and Häkkinen to 6 titles.
This can be debated forever. Newey is responsible for less titles, but he did it with different drivers, and more importantly, different teams. Byrne achieved success with the same team and driver. And without any doubt, the team under Schumacher was as well organized and efficient as could be imagined. But to complicate the issue, Kimi won in a Byrne car, which raises his total to 8.
You can flip a coin to decide a winner on this one, it all depends on a person's individual opinion. As far as I am concerned, both are amazing engineers with stellar records.
Racing should be decided on the track, not the court room.

bhall
bhall
244
Joined: 28 Feb 2006, 21:26

Re: Brawn and Newey

Post

Are you debating yourself? :?: