Im not sure that Lewis would move back, he usually gets what he wants at Merc. At least when he told them, for a second year in a row, that the cockpit was too far forward, they publicly committed to fixing it. On top of that, Merc have some of the best facilities on the grid.BMMR61 wrote: ↑21 Jul 2023, 11:21Yep I get that. However many a great driver (Alonso, Ricciardo etc) has made a poor career choice and missed out on the good times to come. Hypothetically if Lando left today would Lewis consider a shock move back to his old home? Nothing is as simple as it sometimes seems but McLaren atm are working their way into a position of promise in the driver stakes, except both drivers have contracts into 2024&25.
True, I'm cautiously optimistic next year will be a big leap forward under the new team structure Stella has implemented. I also hope the trend of a more competitive car continues this year.f1rules wrote: ↑21 Jul 2023, 11:22Honestly i think Landos "maturing/growing in the team" and more explicit/vocal behavior played a part in Keys departure. For sure he didnt do himself any favours the last two years and the failures, but Lando for some time now was increasingly/very vocal and very direct in saying, flaws was inherited year after year after year. Even after the reset and new rules/concepts, the flaws remained. But that is a thing of the past, now. Things seem to be on the right track and i havent been this positive about Mclaren in a long long time.
James Key joined in 2019, Fernando left at the end of the 2018 season.djos wrote: ↑21 Jul 2023, 09:39Iirc, James key joined for 2018 which was the first year McLaren ran Renault and discovered that their chassis was actually not even close to being decent.
So they redesigned it from scratch for 2019 which was the year Lando joined. I don’t recall if Fernando was still there for 2019 or not.
My point being, I’m not sure if Fernando’s driving style was the primary influence, or finding out their chassis was poor regardless of the PU driving it.
Cheers, I was a little hazy on the timeline.Ground Effect wrote: ↑21 Jul 2023, 11:55James Key joined in 2019, Fernando left at the end of the 2018 season.djos wrote: ↑21 Jul 2023, 09:39Iirc, James key joined for 2018 which was the first year McLaren ran Renault and discovered that their chassis was actually not even close to being decent.
So they redesigned it from scratch for 2019 which was the year Lando joined. I don’t recall if Fernando was still there for 2019 or not.
My point being, I’m not sure if Fernando’s driving style was the primary influence, or finding out their chassis was poor regardless of the PU driving it.
RedBull fired Nyck one hour into the test and replaced him with Daniel, what does that say?
Regarding Key’s impact on car concepts his joining in 2019 meant his first design was meant to be the 2020 car. However the FIA restrictions on development in combination with the change to Mercedes PU meant the 35M was largely a repowered MCL35. So James Key’s first clean sheet designed McLaren was the evolutionary 2021 which was a gentle improvement on its predecessor. last year’s dismal car was most definitely not an improvement in the first year of the ground effect cars. His second go was equally poor and internal rumblings it now seems were at play late last year. The current car is doing pretty well for a “band aid” car, arguably because the primary cause of the poor performance was a lack of aero integration. The handling issue complained of won’t be resolved until, at the earliest, a clean sheet design is introduced next year. I imagine the team are learning an awful lot from the successful change of direction they have taken.Ground Effect wrote: ↑21 Jul 2023, 11:55James Key joined in 2019, Fernando left at the end of the 2018 season.djos wrote: ↑21 Jul 2023, 09:39Iirc, James key joined for 2018 which was the first year McLaren ran Renault and discovered that their chassis was actually not even close to being decent.
So they redesigned it from scratch for 2019 which was the year Lando joined. I don’t recall if Fernando was still there for 2019 or not.
My point being, I’m not sure if Fernando’s driving style was the primary influence, or finding out their chassis was poor regardless of the PU driving it.
Good points, sometimes the timeline blends together in my head. They certainly seemed to have turned a corner on the Aero front, lets hope the overall trajectory continues.BMMR61 wrote: ↑21 Jul 2023, 13:37Regarding Key’s impact on car concepts his joining in 2019 meant his first design was meant to be the 2020 car. However the FIA restrictions on development in combination with the change to Mercedes PU meant the 35M was largely a repowered MCL35. So James Key’s first clean sheet designed McLaren was last year’s dismal 36, the first of the ground effect cars. His second go was equally poor and internal rumblings it now seems were at play late last year. The current car is doing pretty well for a “band aid” car, arguably because the primary cause of the poor performance was a lack of aero integration. The handling issue complained of won’t be resolved until, at the earliest, a clean sheet design is introduced next year. I imagine the team are learning an awful lot from the successful change of direction they have taken.Ground Effect wrote: ↑21 Jul 2023, 11:55James Key joined in 2019, Fernando left at the end of the 2018 season.djos wrote: ↑21 Jul 2023, 09:39Iirc, James key joined for 2018 which was the first year McLaren ran Renault and discovered that their chassis was actually not even close to being decent.
So they redesigned it from scratch for 2019 which was the year Lando joined. I don’t recall if Fernando was still there for 2019 or not.
My point being, I’m not sure if Fernando’s driving style was the primary influence, or finding out their chassis was poor regardless of the PU driving it.
The first car to be overseen by Key was the MCL35, the 2020 car. There were no FIA restrictions then, that came during the covid disrupted season in 2020 for the 2021 car, where the token system was introduced, but McLaren had to give up theirs in exchange for switching to the Mercedes PU.BMMR61 wrote: ↑21 Jul 2023, 13:37Regarding Key’s impact on car concepts his joining in 2019 meant his first design was meant to be the 2020 car. However the FIA restrictions on development in combination with the change to Mercedes PU meant the 35M was largely a repowered MCL35. So James Key’s first clean sheet designed McLaren was the evolutionary 2021 which was a gentle improvement on its predecessor. last year’s dismal car was most definitely not an improvement in the first year of the ground effect cars. His second go was equally poor and internal rumblings it now seems were at play late last year. The current car is doing pretty well for a “band aid” car, arguably because the primary cause of the poor performance was a lack of aero integration. The handling issue complained of won’t be resolved until, at the earliest, a clean sheet design is introduced next year. I imagine the team are learning an awful lot from the successful change of direction they have taken.Ground Effect wrote: ↑21 Jul 2023, 11:55James Key joined in 2019, Fernando left at the end of the 2018 season.djos wrote: ↑21 Jul 2023, 09:39Iirc, James key joined for 2018 which was the first year McLaren ran Renault and discovered that their chassis was actually not even close to being decent.
So they redesigned it from scratch for 2019 which was the year Lando joined. I don’t recall if Fernando was still there for 2019 or not.
My point being, I’m not sure if Fernando’s driving style was the primary influence, or finding out their chassis was poor regardless of the PU driving it.