Cfd and Wind tunnel time don't matter? At all??basti313 wrote: ↑28 Jul 2023, 08:32I do not think that matters at all. It is about using your CFD and wind tunnel right, not how much time you have. RedBull has the lowest time and one of the oldest tunnels...but the smart people to use it right.mwillems wrote: ↑28 Jul 2023, 07:58Do we want them to? Or would it be wiser to take 5th and all the CFD and Wind Tunnel time that comes with it?organic wrote: ↑27 Jul 2023, 22:51I think McLaren catching Ferrari is likely. The car is faster in all conditions and it seems at most track types. Only Singapore and maybe Monza could be problems compared to Ferrari.
McLaren are also operationally better (by far) and morale is exceptionally high. The two drivers are also clearly gelling with the car and are both performing well. Seems likely they catch Ferrari/amr imo
In the end McLaren is still not 100% financially healthy, I think they have still the highest loss in F1. Money is still king as long as you can shift engineers between projects.
Not to that extentmwillems wrote: ↑28 Jul 2023, 17:53Cfd and Wind tunnel time don't matter? At all??basti313 wrote: ↑28 Jul 2023, 08:32I do not think that matters at all. It is about using your CFD and wind tunnel right, not how much time you have. RedBull has the lowest time and one of the oldest tunnels...but the smart people to use it right.
In the end McLaren is still not 100% financially healthy, I think they have still the highest loss in F1. Money is still king as long as you can shift engineers between projects.
Hard to say. Piastri's suddenly looking spectacular now that Lando's car had damage. The gap would probably have been bigger between fastest McLaren and the rest if Lando had a working floor
Let's not diminish that lap mate, I'm a lando fan and that was clearly a pretty stellar lap.
Ah, they have done some fixing of the floor in between sessions, hopefully it's sorted (at least mostly) now.