In comparison the Mclaren element I don't think this looks that big. But angles can deceive and I'll probably be just needing a new eye test lol
Interesting to note the use of the Mclaren (ish) cutout though..
Here in this comparison from the side, I think the McLaren’s modified wing will have a large angle of attack and trimming alone will not be enough to reduce drag, but I could be wrong. It is better to wait until tomorrow and see the effectiveness.mwillems wrote: ↑31 Aug 2023, 17:06In comparison the Mclaren element I don't think this looks that big. But angles can deceive and I'll probably be just needing a new eye test lol
Interesting to note the use of the Mclaren (ish) cutout though..
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F43IEzRXAAA ... name=large
Yeah it does look like last years wing. Let's hope it is capable with this car.LionsHeart wrote: ↑31 Aug 2023, 17:38mwillems, I agree, some have larger wings.
https://ibb.co/PFxDkrV
https://ibb.co/S03yMNM
https://ibb.co/vHDBNq5
https://ibb.co/Ny17NVr
https://ibb.co/555YYpc
https://ibb.co/2jDJ0NX
https://ibb.co/0YG230Y
Here are some photos from last year from Monza. As I see it, McLaren and Ferrari are using variants with last year's rear wings here (weird, it feels like I wrote a similar proposal earlier this year for the rear wing of McLaren and Ferrari). Here you can also see the geometry of the front wing and the beam wing. Curious to see what kind of beam wing will be used this year. And yet, according to these photographs, it seems to be confirmed that the top flap of the Ferrari is larger in area than that of the McLaren. I suppose that the effect of DRS in red cars will be higher.
Good news. So in September we should see the latest updates regarding aerodynamics, in particular the floor and side pontoons.mwillems wrote: ↑31 Aug 2023, 17:42https://it.motorsport.com/f1/news/f1-mc ... /10503727/
MCL60 is no longer being developed.
The AoA is definately less on the Ferrari in comparison to the Mclaren wing and so the element isn't so draggy. Plus the cutout to aid the shedding of DF and drag.LionsHeart wrote: ↑31 Aug 2023, 17:10Here in this comparison from the side, I think the McLaren’s modified wing will have a large angle of attack and trimming alone will not be enough to reduce drag, but I could be wrong. It is better to wait until tomorrow and see the effectiveness.mwillems wrote: ↑31 Aug 2023, 17:06In comparison the Mclaren element I don't think this looks that big. But angles can deceive and I'll probably be just needing a new eye test lol
Interesting to note the use of the Mclaren (ish) cutout though..
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F43IEzRXAAA ... name=large
I'll go look for last year's photos of the rear wing, I don't remember what angle of attack they had in Monza.
Luckily, we didn't have to wait long.mwillems wrote: ↑31 Aug 2023, 17:55Yeah it does look like last years wing. Let's hope it is capable with this car.LionsHeart wrote: ↑31 Aug 2023, 17:38mwillems, I agree, some have larger wings.
https://ibb.co/PFxDkrV
https://ibb.co/S03yMNM
https://ibb.co/vHDBNq5
https://ibb.co/Ny17NVr
https://ibb.co/555YYpc
https://ibb.co/2jDJ0NX
https://ibb.co/0YG230Y
Here are some photos from last year from Monza. As I see it, McLaren and Ferrari are using variants with last year's rear wings here (weird, it feels like I wrote a similar proposal earlier this year for the rear wing of McLaren and Ferrari). Here you can also see the geometry of the front wing and the beam wing. Curious to see what kind of beam wing will be used this year. And yet, according to these photographs, it seems to be confirmed that the top flap of the Ferrari is larger in area than that of the McLaren. I suppose that the effect of DRS in red cars will be higher.
Williams will be really fast. Personally I think Mclaren are fighting for P9 at best.mwillems wrote: ↑31 Aug 2023, 16:53Im not convinced this will be a terrible race, I just think it has potential to be worse than some of the recent races, but still better than Pre Austria. I wouldn't take the engine here, but we can see after FP1 or FP2. If we look slow then it might not be a terrible idea.
Do you have the article In English?mwillems wrote: ↑31 Aug 2023, 17:42https://it.motorsport.com/f1/news/f1-mc ... /10503727/
MCL60 is no longer being developed.
Chrome auto translates for me.CjC wrote: ↑31 Aug 2023, 18:50Do you have the article In English?mwillems wrote: ↑31 Aug 2023, 17:42https://it.motorsport.com/f1/news/f1-mc ... /10503727/
MCL60 is no longer being developed.
Thanks. Now I’ve leant Italian I realise the article is a regurgitation of what I posted the other day.
I can only guess that there is enough difference that the 24 car can't plug parts into this years car.CjC wrote: ↑31 Aug 2023, 20:13Thanks. Now I’ve leant Italian I realise the article is a regurgitation of what I posted the other day.
What I find interesting is and I’ve read Stella being quoted his a few times is they see no benefit to bring any new parts to the MCL60 that were developed for the 2024 machine yet Aston Martin say the opposite and that they will keep developing the ‘23 car with upgrades which have been developed for the ‘24 car?
Well, those developments that are now at the development stage will later be installed in the car in September. As I understand it, this is the last package. And after that, the team will fully focus on the 2024 car. This is good.CjC wrote: ↑31 Aug 2023, 20:13Thanks. Now I’ve leant Italian I realise the article is a regurgitation of what I posted the other day.
What I find interesting is and I’ve read Stella being quoted his a few times is they see no benefit to bring any new parts to the MCL60 that were developed for the 2024 machine yet Aston Martin say the opposite and that they will keep developing the ‘23 car with upgrades which have been developed for the ‘24 car?