Look, yesterday I was trying to figure out what you meant by the average downforce of the rear wing spec for Singapore. I agree with you that this is not the maximum downforce, moreover, the beam wing is also not at maximum downforce, as I could understand and assume. This allowed the team to have a fairly high downforce, but at the same time be fast on the straights.
Let's say, if we compare with the specification for Monaco, then in Singapore we lost 5% in downforce, but in terms of drag we lost 10%. The efficiency is higher, right? The team is solving the problems of high drag that we saw in the first third of the season. And that's great.
And I admit that this is why you said that this wing creates medium downforce, and I told you that it is high downforce. I provided arguments and photographs. I also like to think like you and search for the truth.
A few comments above, I didn’t understand what deg means. I am not an Englishman and I don’t understand all your abbreviated words. Therefore, I asked the comrade what he meant. Where and who am I trying to teach here?
Sometimes it seems that some people here are too sensitive. I don’t want to offend or offend anyone. Just getting closer to the truth. No more.
Who suggested yesterday that we move to another thread to discuss the rear wing? Then did the fellow moderator intervene? I don't want to get banned for something I'm not guilty of.
We've already discussed this before. I respond to comments the way I understand the people here. If I don’t understand, then I ask a counter question. How else? This is a forum.