I think that's comparison from the first runs on softs in fp3
this is from the final runs
I think that's comparison from the first runs on softs in fp3
This is one of those situations when you figure out what works, it becomes a bit easier to find gains… I would argue that we may still be missing a bit in the suspension department… For example, Mercedes seems to be behind from an aero perspective, but may be making the gap on the chassis portion… The addition of the new people for next year will hopefully also helps in the chassis side.f1rules wrote: ↑23 Sep 2023, 06:17To the redbull philosophy…, is maybe a bit much, mclaren seem to incorporate whichever concept they think will gain them performance, and looks like they finally with the new structure, have a very good understanding of, what this era type of cars need, to work well
SmallSoldier wrote: ↑23 Sep 2023, 06:23This is one of those situations when you figure out what works, it becomes a bit easier to find gains… I would argue that we may still be missing a bit in the suspension department… For example, Mercedes seems to be behind from an aero perspective, but may be making the gap on the chassis portion… The addition of the new people for next year will hopefully also helps in the chassis side.f1rules wrote: ↑23 Sep 2023, 06:17To the redbull philosophy…, is maybe a bit much, mclaren seem to incorporate whichever concept they think will gain them performance, and looks like they finally with the new structure, have a very good understanding of, what this era type of cars need, to work well
Is Marshall's gardening finish at the end of 2024?f1rules wrote: ↑23 Sep 2023, 06:35Agree, will be very interesting, with new tools and new people arriving, especially marshall, mr mass damper. Even blabla head helmut marko, recognized, that with the path mclaren is on and their understanding of this ruleset, he said it would be interesting what they come up with for next year when all this knowledge is incorporated into a new car,
SmallSoldier wrote: ↑23 Sep 2023, 06:23This is one of those situations when you figure out what works, it becomes a bit easier to find gains… I would argue that we may still be missing a bit in the suspension department… For example, Mercedes seems to be behind from an aero perspective, but may be making the gap on the chassis portion… The addition of the new people for next year will hopefully also helps in the chassis side.f1rules wrote: ↑23 Sep 2023, 06:17To the redbull philosophy…, is maybe a bit much, mclaren seem to incorporate whichever concept they think will gain them performance, and looks like they finally with the new structure, have a very good understanding of, what this era type of cars need, to work well
And the team will have an slight advantage in terms of CFD and Tunnel time, which should help keep the development rate on the high sidef1rules wrote: ↑23 Sep 2023, 06:35Agree, will be very interesting, with new tools and new people arriving, especially marshall, mr mass damper. Even blabla head helmut marko, recognized, that with the path mclaren is on and their understanding of this ruleset, he said it would be interesting what they come up with for next year when all this knowledge is incorporated into a new car,
SmallSoldier wrote: ↑23 Sep 2023, 06:23This is one of those situations when you figure out what works, it becomes a bit easier to find gains… I would argue that we may still be missing a bit in the suspension department… For example, Mercedes seems to be behind from an aero perspective, but may be making the gap on the chassis portion… The addition of the new people for next year will hopefully also helps in the chassis side.f1rules wrote: ↑23 Sep 2023, 06:17To the redbull philosophy…, is maybe a bit much, mclaren seem to incorporate whichever concept they think will gain them performance, and looks like they finally with the new structure, have a very good understanding of, what this era type of cars need, to work well
Yes… Starts at the beginning of next yearBMMR61 wrote: ↑23 Sep 2023, 06:41Is Marshall's gardening finish at the end of 2024?f1rules wrote: ↑23 Sep 2023, 06:35Agree, will be very interesting, with new tools and new people arriving, especially marshall, mr mass damper. Even blabla head helmut marko, recognized, that with the path mclaren is on and their understanding of this ruleset, he said it would be interesting what they come up with for next year when all this knowledge is incorporated into a new car,
SmallSoldier wrote: ↑23 Sep 2023, 06:23
This is one of those situations when you figure out what works, it becomes a bit easier to find gains… I would argue that we may still be missing a bit in the suspension department… For example, Mercedes seems to be behind from an aero perspective, but may be making the gap on the chassis portion… The addition of the new people for next year will hopefully also helps in the chassis side.
There's definately plenty to pique the interest especially given conversations around why drag coefficients might have changed, but I'm still being a politician on that subject for now. Engine modes etc.SmallSoldier wrote: ↑22 Sep 2023, 21:42Friday times should be taken with a grain of salt, but a couple of things caught my attention… Drag has been reduced considerably, to the point that it matches both RBR and Ferrari in the most drag dependent part of the lap between Spoon and 130R, this is also noticeable against Aston Martin, who used to have better drag than McLaren and now apparently the trend has changed… The RBR seems faster, specially in the “S” complex and through the hairpin, were most of the time is lost.mwillems wrote: ↑22 Sep 2023, 19:33Could be. Or he might have been taking it easy, testing setups... I don't read too much into Friday Times. That advantage to Lando looks so dominant that it makes me suspect it isn't representative. But it may be.Dafnalina wrote: ↑22 Sep 2023, 19:00
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.gpblog ... -prix.html
It seems Oscar has a new engine. Could that make a difference?
Qualifying will be interesting
There is definitely and element of learning from what the other cars have done and you cannot say at this point that we have led the way in development.f1rules wrote: ↑23 Sep 2023, 06:17To the redbull philosophy…, is maybe a bit much, mclaren seem to incorporate whichever concept they think will gain them performance, and looks like they finally with the new structure, have a very good understanding of, what this era type of cars need, to work well
We will find out more after qualifying… It was interesting that they were not using the new concept rear wing, instead using the old onemwillems wrote: ↑23 Sep 2023, 07:22There's definately plenty to pique the interest especially given conversations around why drag coefficients might have changed, but I'm still being a politician on that subject for now. Engine modes etc.SmallSoldier wrote: ↑22 Sep 2023, 21:42Friday times should be taken with a grain of salt, but a couple of things caught my attention… Drag has been reduced considerably, to the point that it matches both RBR and Ferrari in the most drag dependent part of the lap between Spoon and 130R, this is also noticeable against Aston Martin, who used to have better drag than McLaren and now apparently the trend has changed… The RBR seems faster, specially in the “S” complex and through the hairpin, were most of the time is lost.
Qualifying will be interesting
Only 5? Max has just 3 sets of new softs. He's the direct competition and he could only have 1 proper run in Q3. Pole is wide open imo
Yes but I think in outright similar scenarios Max will have a 1-2 tenth margin especially because of the last chicane.. need to have some sort of slight advantage..