A few of us said this would not be the track to see who was hit. You need to look at the maximum DF tracks.
A few of us said this would not be the track to see who was hit. You need to look at the maximum DF tracks.
FYI, this is how the 30 seconds reference became a talking point of this thread:
PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑21 Sep 2023, 14:57Ok so we have our first benchmark:
https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/hamil ... /10522947/
He says if RedBull doesn't win by 30 seconds somwthing is up..
Hyperbole or logical?
There are no maximum downforce tracks remaining. Mexico has thin air so the downforce isn't high even though the wings are big. So I guess we wait until Monaco '24?
You said it yourself, Max proved his point and was not cruising at any point in the race. I would expect him to pull out a bigger gap. So still not out of the woods. I already acknowledged that it is not conclusive how much the RedBull pace would be affected by this but the balance of the car can sort of be argued... And then it's gets even blurrier because RBR can simply tune out the issues lingering from the TD.. So yeah. Thread is sort of moot. Only the actual designers know whats under the skin.Sieper wrote: ↑26 Sep 2023, 00:22Let’s agree to discard eachothers opinions. Seems the best way forward. He was so full of praise Max was determined to make a point. I guess he didn’t discard Lewis opinion. And to get back on topic. A few people here should perhaps not have been so loud about RBR but instead practice what some have preached to wait a few races to see who was actually hit.
If you cared to watch the onboards he was very much cruisingPlatinumZealot wrote: ↑26 Sep 2023, 01:26You said it yourself, Max proved his point and was not cruising at any point in the race. I would expect him to pull out a bigger gap. So still not out of the woods. I already acknowledged that it is not conclusive how much the RedBull pace would be affected by this but the balance of the car can sort of be argued... And then it's gets even blurrier because RBR can simply tune out the issues lingering from the TD.. So yeah. Thread is sort of moot. Only the actual designers know whats under the skin.Sieper wrote: ↑26 Sep 2023, 00:22Let’s agree to discard eachothers opinions. Seems the best way forward. He was so full of praise Max was determined to make a point. I guess he didn’t discard Lewis opinion. And to get back on topic. A few people here should perhaps not have been so loud about RBR but instead practice what some have preached to wait a few races to see who was actually hit.
I have no clue what race you watched man... From quali to the race it was never even close. Max's pace on used tires was better than most other cars on brand new.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑26 Sep 2023, 01:26You said it yourself, Max proved his point and was not cruising at any point in the race. I would expect him to pull out a bigger gap. So still not out of the woods. I already acknowledged that it is not conclusive how much the RedBull pace would be affected by this but the balance of the car can sort of be argued... And then it's gets even blurrier because RBR can simply tune out the issues lingering from the TD.. So yeah. Thread is sort of moot. Only the actual designers know whats under the skin.Sieper wrote: ↑26 Sep 2023, 00:22Let’s agree to discard eachothers opinions. Seems the best way forward. He was so full of praise Max was determined to make a point. I guess he didn’t discard Lewis opinion. And to get back on topic. A few people here should perhaps not have been so loud about RBR but instead practice what some have preached to wait a few races to see who was actually hit.
Maximum downforce tracks usually have a lot of low speed corners and almost no straits with proper top speed. Wings don't flex at low speed - they flex at high speeds. So even with a max DF setup, the wings will never flex properly if the car rarely reaches proper speeds. So that's reverse logic. Monaco is definitely not the track to test this on.dans79 wrote:A few of us said this would not be the track to see who was hit. You need to look at the maximum DF tracks.
I agree on the last point and on the tracks. I would just add, that what you need is a track with some med to high downforce and a long straight to bend the wings. So I agree on the tracks above and this is why I think Qatar might also be good to judge what happened.TFSA wrote: ↑26 Sep 2023, 08:52Maximum downforce tracks usually have a lot of low speed corners and almost no straits with proper top speed. Wings don't flex at low speed - they flex at high speeds. So even with a max DF setup, the wings will never flex properly if the car rarely reaches proper speeds. So that's reverse logic. Monaco is definitely not the track to test this on.dans79 wrote:A few of us said this would not be the track to see who was hit. You need to look at the maximum DF tracks.
The proper tracks are tracks which both have proper straits (top speed), but also a decent combination of medium to high speed corners, which requires a car to run with some good downforce, but also challenges it use that downforce for both braking at speed, but also navigating at speed.
Suzuka is a decent (read: not great, but decent) track to give an idea. It's doesn't have many straits, but it has quite a few high speed corners and cars usually run with a decent chunk downforce for that reason. Austria and Silverstone would probably be even better.
But at the end of the day, the truth is more likely, that this entire flexi-wing thing is a minor performance differentiator. It's not gonna make or break any team.
Not really, because teams will change deployment from track to track to minimize lap time.
I think it was mentioned that the 0.5s quali gap was the biggest it had been in 20 years at Suzuka. This was clear and utter dominance. No need to stress the car during the race to impress more.dialtone wrote: ↑26 Sep 2023, 02:39I have no clue what race you watched man... From quali to the race it was never even close. Max's pace on used tires was better than most other cars on brand new.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑26 Sep 2023, 01:26You said it yourself, Max proved his point and was not cruising at any point in the race. I would expect him to pull out a bigger gap. So still not out of the woods. I already acknowledged that it is not conclusive how much the RedBull pace would be affected by this but the balance of the car can sort of be argued... And then it's gets even blurrier because RBR can simply tune out the issues lingering from the TD.. So yeah. Thread is sort of moot. Only the actual designers know whats under the skin.Sieper wrote: ↑26 Sep 2023, 00:22Let’s agree to discard eachothers opinions. Seems the best way forward. He was so full of praise Max was determined to make a point. I guess he didn’t discard Lewis opinion. And to get back on topic. A few people here should perhaps not have been so loud about RBR but instead practice what some have preached to wait a few races to see who was actually hit.
This is my sense also. RB and Max was cruising more than half of the race.napoleon1981 wrote: ↑26 Sep 2023, 22:14I think it was mentioned that the 0.5s quali gap was the biggest it had been in 20 years at Suzuka. This was clear and utter dominance. No need to stress the car during the race to impress more.dialtone wrote: ↑26 Sep 2023, 02:39I have no clue what race you watched man... From quali to the race it was never even close. Max's pace on used tires was better than most other cars on brand new.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑26 Sep 2023, 01:26
You said it yourself, Max proved his point and was not cruising at any point in the race. I would expect him to pull out a bigger gap. So still not out of the woods. I already acknowledged that it is not conclusive how much the RedBull pace would be affected by this but the balance of the car can sort of be argued... And then it's gets even blurrier because RBR can simply tune out the issues lingering from the TD.. So yeah. Thread is sort of moot. Only the actual designers know whats under the skin.